Hi
I don't know if anyone has come across this before but there is a huge discrepancy in two census records relating to the same person.
1841 Place Coombe Florey, Somerset
John Newick born Somerset age 50, so dob between 1787 and 1791. His Wife Mary has the same age
John was born in 1789 in Lydeard St. Lawrence which fits in with the above date range.
1851 Place Coombe Florey,
John Newick born Lydeard St Lawrence age 78 so dob 1773 which is patently wrong. Wife Mary age 64 so dob 1787 (which fits in with 1841)
The age in the original census of 78 could possibly be 73 or 75 which would give dobs 1776 or 1778 - still nowhere near his actual birth year of 1789.
I have thought maybe the West Country accent might have made his age unclear but 62 or 63 doesn't sound a bit like 78!
Has anyone come across this sort of error before?
Thanks
Mary
Results 1 to 9 of 9
Thread: Incorrect Census record
-
07-02-2018, 6:27 AM #1
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- Australia
- Posts
- 224
Incorrect Census record
-
07-02-2018, 8:13 AM #2
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- NORTHAMPTONSHIRE, ENGLAND
- Posts
- 3,216
1841 census ages over 15 where rounded up or down 5 years. so if he was say 52 it would be rounded down to 50 or if he was say 58 it would have been rounded up to 60. Also depends on who filled the forms in as to weather the right age was put down.
I would be looking for a christening/baptism for a rough date as that is about all you will find, unless you have a death cert. and the person giving the details knew when he was born is real date of birth.
-
07-02-2018, 8:23 AM #3
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Location
- Lancashire
- Posts
- 3,648
The 1841 census is notoriously out on ages. Enumerates were instructed to round down the age of anyone over the age of 16.
https://www.hunimex.com/warwick/censu...enum_inst.html
Lots of us come across inconsistencies between different censuses. There are a whole range of reasons for that including the obvious one that the person who supplied the original information got it wrong.
Have you found a baptism for him as that might give you a clue as to his date of birth.
OOPS I CAN SEE THAT SANDYHALL CAN TYPE FASTER THAN I!Last edited by Pam Downes; 07-02-2018 at 10:20 AM. Reason: Apologies
-
07-02-2018, 9:35 AM #4
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- wales
- Posts
- 3,451
General Register Office (GRO) (Free to register/search)
https://www.gro.gov.uk/gro/content/c...ates/Login.asp
1837-1974 Combe Florey fell within the Taunton Registration District (source - Genuki Reg. Dists.)
The GRO has the death registration of a -
John Newick, March Qtr 1852, age 79, reg dist. Taunton, volume 5c, page 307
Again, age at death depends on the knowledge of the informant."dyfal donc a dyr y garreg"
-
07-02-2018, 2:09 PM #5
- Join Date
- Jun 2013
- Location
- Parbold, Lancashire
- Posts
- 822
This appears to be the burial in Combe Florey (adjacent parish to Lydeard St Lawrence) as follows:
John NEWICK, Sexton, buried 1st January 1852 (original looks like 18th January) aged 69 (so born c.1783).
The 1851 Census has him at Rectory House, Combe Florey.
Could this be John-1? If so, the puzzle remains, why two Johns to the same parents?
This ties in with your other thread here:
https://www.british-genealogy.com/th...sm-death-dates
Peter
-
08-02-2018, 4:09 AM #6
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- Australia
- Posts
- 224
Thanks for that. I have checked his baptism which is 1789 - so within the date range for the 1841 census. It's the patently incorrect age in the 1851 census that I cannot fathom!
-
08-02-2018, 4:13 AM #7
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- Australia
- Posts
- 224
-
08-02-2018, 4:17 AM #8
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- Australia
- Posts
- 224
-
08-02-2018, 4:19 AM #9
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- Australia
- Posts
- 224
Helping you trace your British Family History & British Genealogy.
All times are GMT. The time now is 4:09 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5
Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.
Bookmarks