I seem to have a 14-year old girl acting as witness at her mother's second marriage. Is that at all unusual ? This was in 1826. I guess if at least one witness had to be a family member she might have been the only one available ?
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
Thread: marriage witness minimum age ?
-
05-12-2017 5:21 AM #1
- Join Date
- Aug 2016
- Location
- East Sussex
- Posts
- 572
- Thanks
- 290
- Thanked 158 Times in 141 Posts
marriage witness minimum age ?
-
05-12-2017 7:11 AM #2
- Join Date
- Nov 2013
- Location
- UK
- Posts
- 3,061
- Thanks
- 438
- Thanked 1,017 Times in 946 Posts
As far as I'm aware there was no minimum age. So long as the officiating minister was satisfied a witnesses understood the role and knew the person.
See here:
http://www.
dixons.clara.co.uk/Certificates/marriages.htm#COL10Alma
-
The Following User Says Thank You to almach For This Useful Post:
wimsey (05-12-2017)
-
05-12-2017 8:42 AM #3
- Join Date
- Jun 2017
- Location
- Buckinghamshire
- Posts
- 17
- Thanks
- 0
- Thanked 14 Times in 7 Posts
There is no minimum age - and there is no requirement that they know the people getting married. Witnesses could be strangers off the street, which does occasionally happen. In older church weddings, one of the witnesses is often the parish clerk or churchwarden and you see their name on numerous weddings in the register.
The only requirement is that there is at least two (can be more) and that they are old enough to understand what they are witnessing, and to be able to give evidence of it in the future if required.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to AntonyMMM For This Useful Post:
wimsey (05-12-2017)
-
05-12-2017 9:13 AM #4
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- Kent
- Posts
- 16,267
- Thanks
- 11
- Thanked 2,595 Times in 2,245 Posts
The current regulations simply say
"Two or more witnesses must be present at the marriage. There is no restriction on the number of witnesses nor is there an age limit but they must be able to understand what is taking place and testify if necessary as to what they have seen and heard."
-
The Following User Says Thank You to Peter Goodey For This Useful Post:
wimsey (05-12-2017)
-
05-12-2017 9:43 AM #5
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- wales
- Posts
- 1,893
- Thanks
- 0
- Thanked 741 Times in 674 Posts
James Barclay, the Curate of Edmonton, Middlesex in his 1774 "A complete and universal Dictionary on a new plan: including not only I. A full explanation of difficult words and technical terms and II. ..."
under the heading AGE has -
"In law a man at 12 years of age ought to take the oath of allegiance to the king in a leet; at fourteeen, which is his age of discretion, he may marry, choose his guardian and claim his land held in socage. His full age is twenty one, in man or woman. A woman is dowable at nine years of age, may marry at twelve, and at fourten choose her guardian. At fourteen a man may dispose of his personal estate by will, but not of lands; and at this a man or woman is capable of being a witness."
He seems to have lifted this verbatim from John Merchant's 1760 Dictionary which in turn is based on Samuel Johnson's 1755 Dictionary - which did not refer to witness age."dyfal donc a dyr y garreg"
-
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to helachau For This Useful Post:
Mitch in Notts (05-12-2017), wimsey (05-12-2017)
-
05-12-2017 2:17 PM #6
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- Kent
- Posts
- 16,267
- Thanks
- 11
- Thanked 2,595 Times in 2,245 Posts
At fourteen a man may dispose of his personal estate by will, but not of lands; and at this a man or woman is capable of being a witness.
Whatever it refers to, there is no age limit for a marriage witness.
Helping you trace your British Family History & British Genealogy.
All times are GMT. The time now is 7:11 AM.
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.3
Copyright © 2018 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Bookmarks