Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Knowledgeable and helpful
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Paeroa, New Zealand
    Posts
    651

    Default Was she the oldest person

    I am researching a twiglet and came across something that made me do a double take.
    On the 1871 transcription that I looked at on Familysearch a daughter's age was transcribed as 323.
    You have to be joking was my first reaction but curiosity directed me to the image on Findmypast.
    And that is where I found the error.
    The enumerator had written the daughter's age 23 in the male column, realised the error and correctly put the age 23 in the female column. Then he/she proceeded to cross out the incorrect age in the male column but did not cover the units digit '3" - so the age looked like 323.

  2. #2
    janbooth
    Guest

    Default

    Didn't she do well!!

    Janet

  3. #3
    Name well known on Brit-Gen
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    4,863

    Default

    Raised a smile this morning

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Select a file: