Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18
  1. #11
    Super Moderator christanel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Wairarapa New Zealand
    Posts
    10,682

    Default

    UK, Railway Employment Records, 1833-1956
    Harry Ebenezer Pearce
    Age 17 date of birth 4 June 1879
    Junior porter
    Date of entry in to service 21 April 1897
    wage 26 November 1897
    Date of leaving 30 June 1898.
    So a short employment record
    I am trying to decipher some words written in the same column as the leaving date.
    Sometimes paranoia is just having all the facts.
    William Burroughs

  2. #12
    Super Moderator christanel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Wairarapa New Zealand
    Posts
    10,682

    Default

    The date 30 June 1898 may have been when he was transferred to Willesden.
    Christina
    Sometimes paranoia is just having all the facts.
    William Burroughs

  3. #13
    Famous for offering help & advice
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    East Sussex
    Posts
    1,246

    Default

    so are we saying that he was probably born 4 June 1880 because he didn't really know which year he was born ?

  4. #14
    Super Moderator christanel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Wairarapa New Zealand
    Posts
    10,682

    Default

    so are we saying that he was probably born 4 June 1880 because he didn't really know which year he was born ?
    From the evidence in the 1881 census I would say the answer to your question is yes.

    Quote Originally Posted by almach View Post
    The birth reg Sept 1880 does tally with a child aged 10 months in 1881 census which was taken 4th Apr. As for the other records being a year or so out: as Christina says people weren't very precise back then with their age, most didn't celebrate birthdays and were not particularly concerned with exactness.
    Sometimes paranoia is just having all the facts.
    William Burroughs

  5. #15
    Famous for offering help & advice
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    East Sussex
    Posts
    1,246

    Default

    thanks. It rather throws into question the accuracy of any information on any document. My whole family tree could be completely fictitious !

  6. #16
    Super Moderator christanel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Wairarapa New Zealand
    Posts
    10,682

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wimsey View Post
    thanks. It rather throws into question the accuracy of any information on any document. My whole family tree could be completely fictitious !
    Not if you have backed up your findings with death, marriage and birth certificates. Do you have Harry Ebenezer's marriage certificate which would give his father's name and occupation?
    How did you get back to Harry Ebenezer being you ancestor?
    Christina
    Sometimes paranoia is just having all the facts.
    William Burroughs

  7. #17
    Famous for offering help & advice
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    East Sussex
    Posts
    1,246

    Default

    yes I do have the marriage certificate - it fits in with what I thought I knew about his father. But I am beginning to doubt everything now. It seems to me certificates are just as likely to be inaccurate as anything else - I have at least one marriage certificate which has false information on it.

  8. #18
    Famous for offering help & advice
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    East Sussex
    Posts
    1,246

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by christanel View Post
    How did you get back to Harry Ebenezer being you ancestor?
    Christina
    my starting point would have been that 1881 census where he is amongst the family which I had thought to be ancestors too. Plus family anecdote about an uncle Harry who had briefly emigrated to Canada. Sly Corner, Lee Common, Bucks, on the 1881 census, is a location well known to me. My mother was from Lee Common - I'm not really doubting that this is the correct family, but if no-one was sure of their own date of birth, how much else were they unsure of when filling out forms or conveying information to census collectors or registrars or clergymen ?

    I'm just making a general point about the accuracy of information on documents.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Select a file: