Results 11 to 20 of 22
Thread: Jane Hughes Kirkwood
-
27-01-2016, 2:56 PM #11
- Join Date
- Aug 2015
- Location
- Hereford, England.
- Posts
- 495
-
27-01-2016, 3:00 PM #12
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- NORTHAMPTONSHIRE, ENGLAND
- Posts
- 3,216
These 8 person where married in this first Quarter
Q1 1947 means First Quarter (3 months) 1947 - Jan, Feb, March
5g means Volume Number
608 means Page Number
If Jane had been married before the marriages would be in separate Volumes and on different pages
there would not be 3 different certificates issued with her different names on when she married John Kirkwood
-
27-01-2016, 3:11 PM #13
- Join Date
- Aug 2015
- Location
- Hereford, England.
- Posts
- 495
The reason for six Kirkwood marriage listings is the way FReeBMD have transcribed the entry and the way the entry has been entered into GRO Index.
There was only ONE certificate issued for her marriage to John Kirkwood which included the THREE surnames that Jane G ??? was/had been known by.
There would of course been certificates issued for Jane G ???'s previous marriages.Last edited by macwil; 27-01-2016 at 3:15 PM. Reason: clarification
-
27-01-2016, 3:13 PM #14
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- NORTHAMPTONSHIRE, ENGLAND
- Posts
- 3,216
Looked on FreeBMD for marriages of Jane Hughes to Mr Ewing or Mr Caddle nothing coming up
-
27-01-2016, 9:17 PM #15There was only ONE certificate issued for her marriage to John Kirkwood which included the THREE surnames that Jane G ??? was/had been known by.
Jane may, or may not have been married to a Caddle or Ewing, these were surnames she had previously been known by,Alma
-
27-01-2016, 9:39 PM #16
These births suggest the above marriage is not the one pwholt is looking for, Jane Hughes born 1880 would be too old to be giving birth in 1940. As this person born 1940 could still be alive I will be careful with what info I post.
Check Births Jun 1940, Surrey Mid East, vol 2a, page 628, Caddle/Ewing or Kirkwood/EwingAlma
-
16-03-2016, 8:04 AM #17
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Location
- Garston,Liverpool
- Posts
- 383
after reading this I am not convinced ...Jane - if she married in 1917 she was 37 - do you have proof she divorced ??...the chances areif that is your Jane - that her husband may have been killed in WW1 - and in 1901 she was a 21 yr old working in a Cafe ??...she must have met many many men working there ...I would suggest that not being able to find her from 1901 census onwards - she probably married between 1901 and 1911 ...having a little look around
-
16-03-2016, 10:02 AM #18
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Wiltshire
- Posts
- 732
Thanks, Garstonite, but if you knew Auntie Jane, it is perfectly in character for her not to marry until she was 37. She was definitely an early women's lib type. Probably a Suffragette as well, although none of the family tales so indicate.pwholt
-
20-07-2016, 11:07 PM #19
- Join Date
- Jul 2016
- Location
- Toronto
- Posts
- 3
John Kirkwood
Not sure if this is helpful but I had a great Uncle John Kirkwood who was a lecturer in textiles at Belfast Technical College, he lived in Carrickfergus with his 2nd wife Jane but I was only young when he died and unfortunately my parents are dead and also his children from his first marriage so I can't really get you any more information .
-
21-07-2016, 12:05 AM #20
- Join Date
- Jul 2016
- Location
- Toronto
- Posts
- 3
Helping you trace your British Family History & British Genealogy.
All times are GMT. The time now is 6:53 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5
Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.
Bookmarks