Hi Jane
Degree of Instruction is the first one. Some have Imp in that column, others which I see as Well
Maliciously cutting with intent but I don't see the little mark after this and after To remain as ditto marks. To me they look completely different to the other capital D they used for ditto. I have no idea what it is though.
If the first one is a ditto then it would be Maliciously cutting with intent larceny.
Results 11 to 20 of 32
Thread: Criminal lunatic
-
05-01-2011, 5:55 AM #11
-
05-01-2011, 7:20 AM #12spisonGuest
Thanks for looking Christanel.
Hopefully someone else will be able to shed light on the dittos (or whatever), 'Will', 'Well' or 'Imp' mean. Some of those sentenced alternatively have an 'N' in the Degree of Instruction column.
Jane
-
05-01-2011, 9:01 AM #13
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Location
- North London
- Posts
- 5,147
-
05-01-2011, 9:01 AM #14
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- South Australia
- Posts
- 4,594
-
05-01-2011, 9:54 AM #15spisonGuest
Thanks Waitabit and Kerrywood. So he could read and write well!
Well! Well! How interesting is this!? He is almost without doubt my g-g-g-g-grandfather. The certificates and some more census searching will hopefully completely round it out.
For anyone in Australia who is wondering - the 19th Century newspapers are accessible from home provided you hold a National Library of Australia Readers Card. Gasser's references have given me this background and hopefully Bethlem Archives will have some original documents.
James stabbed his wife, Mary, in Darlaston in November 1836. Her evidence was that he was insane and the case was stopped. The 1854 article is very long with a huge amount of background info. He sued one David Kidd and was awarded damages. He was released from Bethel in 1853. It will be interesting to see exactly what date in 1853, Mary Sirdefield died. Once out he went to his children in Dolston, Staffordshire. I don't yet know which children but it doesn't appear to be Benjamin or Isaac.
Thanks for everyone who helped point me in the right direction.
Jane
-
05-01-2011, 10:57 AM #16
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Location
- North London
- Posts
- 5,147
-
05-01-2011, 11:13 AM #17gasserGuestJane, did you also see the report of the court hearing published in The Examiner on Sunday, March 26, 1837?
-
05-01-2011, 8:51 PM #18spisonGuest
Thanks Kerrywood. I'd missed it but using the various spellings of Sirdefield and no James gets a few more. I haven't yet found a more detailed article. (19th c. newspapers is my new - albeit temporary - favourite site as I've also found the date of the elusive first marriage of another ancestor which has shed a whole new light on his date of arrival in Oz!) James's 'insanity' puts a whole new perspective on this line of the family. His granddaughter, Jane, also ended her days in a mental hospital although we do know what triggered this admission.
Jane (who is now reconsidering the use of one of her favourite sayings viz. "This is driving me ")
-
05-01-2011, 9:22 PM #19GeoffersGuest
Many thanks for the update and confirming that this chap is related. It may not be what you hoped for in your ancestry; but I feel that asking the question and getting a successful answer is the most important thing. I wonder what is was that affected his state of mind to attack his wife?
-
05-01-2011, 11:43 PM #20spisonGuest
Thanks Geoffers and I totally agree with you.
I'm actually pretty excited about this find and mum (who was the original family researcher) has also been pretty resigned to it. I warned her last night that she may not like what I'd found but this morning when I asked her if she really wanted to know and we discussed the events and read the article she still maintains she feels better than when we found an abandoned wife in the poorhouse for another family member.
According to the last article found by Kerrywood, James's wife put his insanity down to losing money during the sale of his house BUT Mary also said that his father (also James if the 1854 IGI marriage is him - and I think it is) was "off his head" and his brother and an uncle had died demented. James had a tendency to be an abusive husband, even before he snapped in November 1836, which wasn't all that uncommon at the time (or even now?).
Such a potential for records here. TNA here I come!
JaneLast edited by spison; 05-01-2011 at 11:45 PM. Reason: added a smart comment
Helping you trace your British Family History & British Genealogy.
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:04 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5
Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.
Bookmarks