Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 32
  1. #11
    busyglen
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Astoria View Post
    Name: William Puxty
    Age: 25
    Estimated Birth Year: abt 1816
    Gender: Male
    Where born: Sussex, England

    Civil Parish: Ticehurst
    Hundred: Shoyswell
    County/Island: Sussex
    Country: England

    Street address:

    Occupation:

    View Image

    Registration district: Ticehurst
    Sub registration district: Ticehurst
    Neighbors: View others on page
    Household Members:
    Name Age
    William Puxty 25
    Eliza Puxty 20
    Mary Puxty 5
    Frances Puxty 3
    N K Puxty 1 Mo
    Deborah Puxty 20
    Thomas Joffery 25

    Source Citation: Class: HO107; Piece 1109; Book: 7; Civil Parish: Ticehurst; County: Sussex; Enumeration District: 8; Folio: 31; Page: 15; Line: 17;

    Address Flimwill, occupation shoemaker
    Wow! You have all been busy haven't you?

    This is the right one. The ages are about right for William & Eliza, and the Mary (Ann) was 15 on the 1851, so that's good. Frances is correct, and the KN is Anne.

    Thank you so much for this . I wonder why it didn't come up with my source?

    The 1851 is correct also.

    I'm one happy bunny.

    Glenys

  2. #12
    Astoria
    Guest

    Default Well there's a choice

    Deaths Mar 1844 (>99%)
    PUXTY George Fair Ticehurst 7 386

    Deaths Mar 1848 (>99%)
    Puxty Harry Ticehurst 7 419

    Deaths Mar 1849 (>99%)
    Puxty James Ticehurst 7 401

  3. #13
    Astoria
    Guest

    Default

    I have the KN as a male, am I mistaken?

  4. #14
    Marie C..
    Guest

    Default

    Glenys you said "No name" was Anne.Where was she in 1851.

  5. #15
    Astoria
    Guest

    Default Checked image

    1 Month - male.

  6. #16
    busyglen
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Marie C.. View Post
    Glenys you said "No name" was Anne.Where was she in 1851.
    Sorry I'm having a job keeping up with you guys!

    I 'think' that Anne died as she isn't on any other Census'. William was then next born, 1843 which is on the 1851.

    This is definately the right family, but because there are so many in the families, 10 born in this one, and there are a lot of Williams it's a job lining up the right ones. This family had two Williams and I have got them the wrong way round, so I have been trying to clarify this.

    One William, the 1843 one married Sarah Forward (I think). I am not sure about the 1857 one, I will have to look for the deaths.


    Glenys

  7. #17
    Astoria
    Guest

    Default

    Astoria and Marie - AKA - Morecambe and Wise

  8. #18
    busyglen
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Astoria View Post
    1 Month - male.
    Oh! Blast!

    Could they have been twins born, and Anne lived? This is definately the right family.

    Glenys

  9. #19
    busyglen
    Guest

    Default

    These are great! Not sure if any of these match up but I will have fun trying to find out.

    Glenys

  10. #20
    busyglen
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Astoria View Post
    Astoria and Marie - AKA - Morecambe and Wise
    You are really brilliant....you make a good team.

    I've now got a headache, and am going to lie in a darkened room (fireworks permitting) and clear my mind. Tomorrow morning I am going to try and crack this!

    Glenys

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Select a file: