Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12
  1. #11
    Marie C..
    Guest

    Default Agricultural labourer -to farmer

    This was perfectly possible. An ag lab could be given the tenancy of a few acres and he'd be entitled to call himself a farmer. I have in my family farmers who had sons. Whilst the father farmed each son's occupation was given as "Farmer's son".When the father died the eldest son inherited and the other sons, some of whom worked the home farm, gave their occupations as agricultural labourers.,which they were.
    In later censuses some of these sons then tenanted land or in some cases purchased it depending on circumstances. and were then farmers... so yes agricural labours could become farmers.
    And farmers could lose their land and have to resort to being agricultural labourers. Fortunes went up and down according to seasons and changes in farming etc.
    Marie

  2. #12
    Tinker
    Guest

    Default

    I'm able to confirm what Marie C has said. I've come across the same scenario while researching a neighbour's family who were ag.labs/farmers in Wiltshire. One ancestor went from reasonably prosperous tenant farmer to pauper in his lifetime, while others went from ag.lab to farmer and back again, before farming declined and the Great Western Railways in Swindon took them away from the land.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Select a file: