Not sure if this is the right forum for this ...
I am puzzled by the following ...
In the parish records of St Michael the Archangel, Braintree, Essex [spelling in document retained]
Record No 33
John Hardy of this parish Batchelor and Fortune Rayner of this parish Spinster were married in this church by banns this eighteenth day of April in the year one thousand seven and ninety two by me Chrisn Lawson Curate. This marriage was solemnized between us John Hardy, Fortune Rayner's mark in the presence of Peter Brown, Robt Collis
So far so good but ...
Record No. 188 John Hardey widower of the parish of St Andrews the Great Cambridge and Furtun Rayner of this parish were married in this church by Licence this sixth day of February in the year one thousand eight hundred and one by me Bernard Scale vicar. This marriage was solemnized between us John Hardy, Fortun Rayner her mark in the presence of us James Jocelyn Overseer, Edmd Peers, John Collis
To me it LOOKS like this might mean that John Hardy was not a bachelor as claimed in the 1792 marriage, and that his wife died between 1792 and 1801, and he re-married Fortune in 1801 .....
I would appreciate the opinion on this of any one who cares to reply.
Results 1 to 8 of 8
Thread: Hardy-Rayner Marriages
-
01-05-2022, 3:06 AM #1
Hardy-Rayner Marriages
-
01-05-2022, 8:09 AM #2
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Location
- cambridge
- Posts
- 1,084
-
01-05-2022, 9:08 AM #3
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- England
- Posts
- 9,636
DB - Following on from Sue's reply, my question is - are you looking at original documents, or transcripts?
Secondly, as strange, weird, and unlikely as it may seem, it is possible that you can have two couples with the same names marrying. Especially back in the 1700s and 1800s when naming patterns were in full swing so each generation would have four or five Thomases named after father/grandfather with a similar numbers of Marys named after mum or granny.
If you haven't already done so, you need to start looking for births of Fortun(e) Rayners. Not just assume that there was only one.Vulcan XH558 - “Don't cry because it's over, smile because it happened.”
-
01-05-2022, 11:38 AM #4
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Location
- cambridge
- Posts
- 1,084
There is a baptism between 1670-1796 for a Fortune Rayner - St. Mary the Virgin, Bocking. Parents John and Mary.
There is also a burial on 14 January 1728 for a Fortune Rayner, wife of John in the same Church.
-
01-05-2022, 12:19 PM #5
- Join Date
- Feb 2018
- Location
- England
- Posts
- 1,456
I'd say your theory is certainly a possibility, and if nothing else should prompt you to carry out further searches for a possible earlier marriage of John Hardy, and for anything else you can gather about him.
Marrying a second time by licence rather than banns certainly suggests they didn't wanted to advertise it.
I have a couple who married twice because their first marriage was invalid (he'd married his deceased wife's sister, which only became lawful after 1907), so re-marrying to legitimise it is certainly a possibility.
-
01-05-2022, 4:21 PM #6
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- wales
- Posts
- 3,463
FMP - transcripts only
Boyd's Marriage Index
Fortune Rainer, year - 1792, spouse - John Hardy, place - Braintree
Fortune Rainer, year - 1801, spouse - John Hardy, place - Braintree
Essex Marriages & Banns 1557-1935
Fortune Rayner, marital status - S, residence - Danbury, date - 18 Apr 1792, place - Braintree and John Hardy, marital status - B, residence - Danbury
England Marriages 1538 - 1973
Fortune Rayner, date - 6 Feb 1801, place - Braintree and John Hardy, residence - Braintree
Burials
Fortune Hardy, age - 67, burial date - 25 Mar 1833, place - Braintree, Church of St Michael the Archangel"dyfal donc a dyr y garreg"
-
01-05-2022, 9:05 PM #7
Thank you one and all for your thoughts. Certainly plenty to work on with all your much appreciated suggestions. There must be something in the water in Essex as NONE of my Essex ancestral lines are proving to be straight-forward.
-
01-05-2022, 9:09 PM #8
I am looking at D/P 264/1/9 on the Essex Archives Online site. Judging from the observation that the signatures are in a different hand to the names in the body of the form leads me to conclude that these are original records. I thought I had replied to this post, but I cannot find it.....
Helping you trace your British Family History & British Genealogy.
All times are GMT. The time now is 6:37 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5
Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.
Bookmarks