Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 24 of 24
  1. #21
    Super Moderator - Completely bonkers and will never change.
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    England
    Posts
    9,629

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wimsey View Post
    stupid me, thats how the names have been transcribed by Ancestry, not how they actually appear on the page.

    Mary A Law
    Wyndham Law
    Gladys Law
    Julia B Law
    That's why it's (usually ) good practice to quote the census reference (e.g. RG12/9808 folio 1234 page 579) because then it doesn't matter how the entry has been transcribed as people can easily find it.
    Problems occur when people say something along the lines of 'Louisa Smith born in Bournemouth in 1850 was living in Liverpool in 1881'. They totally overlook the fact that x company has transcribed Louisa as Louise; her age on the census equates to being born in 1847; the birthplace is given as Boscombe; and she's living in the West Derby area of Liverpool, so you need to enter West Derby as the place and not Liverpool.
    Perhaps that's a slight exaggeration of the number of errors, but you get the idea. Say what the transcription says, even if the details are contrary to the truth. There's nothing (apart from laziness, or ignorance if you're totally new to family history) from saying 'although Louisa was actually born in 1850 her age in the 1881 census is given as 34'.
    If you only give the transcription details you should say which company is responsible for the transcription, because you-know-whose-law will dictate that the other main subscription company has indexed the entry correctly according to what's written on the image page.

    Pam
    Vulcan XH558 - “Don't cry because it's over, smile because it happened.”

  2. #22
    Famous for offering help & advice
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    East Sussex
    Posts
    1,246

    Default

    I follow what you're saying but I wouldn't want anyone without an Ancestry subscription to beetle off looking for Mary A Whiting anywhere else.

  3. #23
    Famous for offering help & advice
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    England
    Posts
    1,456

    Default

    It doesn't particularly help, but in 1933 Julia (as Julia Blanche WARREN) is on the electoral roll at 108 Earls Court Road with Gladys and Mary Amherst Amelia Law.

    She's still with them in 1934, but this time as Julia Blanche LAW.

    She wasn't there in 1932, but other family members were.

  4. #24
    Famous for offering help & advice
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    East Sussex
    Posts
    1,246

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jomot1 View Post
    It doesn't particularly help, but in 1933 Julia (as Julia Blanche WARREN) is on the electoral roll at 108 Earls Court Road with Gladys and Mary Amherst Amelia Law.

    She's still with them in 1934, but this time as Julia Blanche LAW.

    She wasn't there in 1932, but other family members were.
    thank you

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Select a file: