Need help with Paulet/Pawlett family

[Aithne]

I have this info.
william Paulett, mariner, died 1856.

[Pam Downes]

I have this info.
william Paulett, mariner, died 1856.

Apologies. When I said search for a burial for a William between October 1823 and 1841 I meant search for a burial for William junior, just to make sure that he was still alive in 1841 and therefore likely to be the one who was ultimately transported.

Pam

[Aithne]

Apologies. When I said search for a burial for a William between October 1823 and 1841 I meant search for a burial for William junior, just to make sure that he was still alive in 1841 and therefore likely to be the one who was ultimately transported.

Pam

I haven’t been able to find a death for him, not in UK, anyway.

[Aithne]

I haven’t been able to find a death for him, not in UK, anyway.

Also, Llewhellins on 1851 census says Bosherton for James’ birth, and Carew for the other 3. Then the 1861 census has carew for the younger children. I looked up their births but no matches come back unless i cast a wide net and i can’t see any for Carew.

[Pam Downes]

Firstly, my sincere apologies for the appalling number of typos in post #9. My proof-readng skills were sadly lacking.
Steynton was consistently spelt in error as Steyton. And Stainton with regard to the parish register entry was mis-spelt as Stainiton. I even managed to spell 'father' as 'gather'.

I have now gone back and corrected those errors, and if you copied anything please do the same in your records.

Also, Llewhellins on 1851 census says Bosherton for James’ birth, and Carew for the other 3. Then the 1861 census has carew for the younger children. I looked up their births but no matches come back unless i cast a wide net and i can’t see any for Carew.

How is the Llewhellin name transcribed in 1851 and 1861, where are James and Elizabeth living, and what are the names of their children, as I can't easily find them to check anything. (As I've previously said, the actual census reference is by far the easiest way to give details. If you look at the transcript page, the information is there.)

Pam

[Aithne]

Firstly, my sincere apologies for the appalling number of typos in post #9. My proof-readng skills were sadly lacking.
Steynton was consistently spelt in error as Steyton. And Stainton with regard to the parish register entry was mis-spelt as Stainiton. I even managed to spell 'father' as 'gather'.

I have now gone back and corrected those errors, and if you copied anything please do the same in your records.


How is the Llewhellin name transcribed in 1851 and 1861, where are James and Elizabeth living, and what are the names of their children, as I can't easily find them to check anything. (As I've previously said, the actual census reference is by far the easiest way to give details. If you look at the transcript page, the information is there.)

Pam

It’s not easy to copy because like i said in a previous comment, i’m posting here from my phone. ancestry is on my laptop.
Let’s see how this works

Carew, Pembrokeshire
HO107/2476 Folio 208, Page number 21.
James Llewhellin,31, born Bosherston
Elizabeth Llewhellin, 29, Carew
William Llewhellin, 4, Carew
Thomas Llewhellin, 2, Carew

Safe to say, copying and pasting on a phone doesn’t really work. And there’s no easy way to edit without typing the whole lot.

[Aithne]

Hmm.., i edited my post to add town and street in 1851 census for James and Elizabeth Llewhellin says Carew Newtown. But that’s disappeared now. Children William and Thomas.

The 1841 Census that also lists William Pawlett says Haverfordwest. No children.

1861 census says James and Elizabeth, childre:
Thomas 12
Mary 9
George 7
James 4
John looks like 18 months.
Again, Carew Newton

Looking for a birth for the children i can’t find anything for Carew.

[Pam Downes]

I am not asking you to copy-and-paste which is in breech of our T&Cs regarding copyright. (Every site has its own way of transcribing records and presenting that transcription, and that is copyright.) I've therefore amended your post.
On Ancestry if you hover your cursor over 'view record' to the left of the person's name you will see a load of detail, and near the bottom of the entry there's the words piece number, folio, and page. Those are the bits of information that make up the census reference, once they are preceded by the year 'code'.
1841 and 1851 both use HO107/.
1861 is RG9/
1871 is RG10/
1881 is RG11/
1891 is RG12/
1901 is RG12/
1911 is RG14/
and I suspect the 1921 census will be RG15.

So all you needed to type for James and Elizabeth in 1851 is Census reference HO107/2476 folio 208 page 21.
You could have added that James is 31 so hasn't aged much since 1841 (which is why I couldn't find them in 1851 ).

Um, in both 1851 and the 1861 census James is 'consistent' with his age (aged 10 years between the two) and his occupation of limestone quarryman and stone quarrier.
I'm therefore inclined to think that this James is not the one living in Pembroke with William Pawlett in 1841.
I think this is the 1851/1861 James in 1841 - living in Bosherston, aged 20, servant, surname spelt Llewelen. Census reference given correctly on FMP as HO107/1443/2 folio 7 page 9. Ancestry incorrectly say it's folio 8 page 9.
Think this is the marriage of the 1851/1861 James and Elizabeth. (Image on FMP's Pembrokeshire marriages dataset.)
22 February 1846 in Carew. James Llewhellin, labourer, and Elizabeth Lewis.
There are Llewhellin births with mother's maiden name Lewis in Pembroke registration district on the GRO's own website which match James and Elizabeth's children in the 1851 and 1861 census. Bosherston and Carew are both in Pembroke registration district.

Pam

[Aithne]

I am not asking you to copy-and-paste which is in breech of our T&Cs regarding copyright. (Every site has its own way of transcribing records and presenting that transcription, and that is copyright.) I've therefore amended your post.
On Ancestry if you hover your cursor over 'view record' to the left of the person's name you will see a load of detail, and near the bottom of the entry there's the words piece number, folio, and page. Those are the bits of information that make up the census reference, once they are preceded by the year 'code'.
1841 and 1851 both use HO107/.
1861 is RG9/
1871 is RG10/
1881 is RG11/
1891 is RG12/
1901 is RG12/
1911 is RG14/
and I suspect the 1921 census will be RG15.

So all you needed to type for James and Elizabeth in 1851 is Census reference HO107/2476 folio 208 page 21.
You could have added that James is 31 so hasn't aged much since 1841 (which is why I couldn't find them in 1851 ).

Um, in both 1851 and the 1861 census James is 'consistent' with his age (aged 10 years between the two) and his occupation of limestone quarryman and stone quarrier.
I'm therefore inclined to think that this James is not the one living in Pembroke with William Pawlett in 1841.
I think this is the 1851/1861 James in 1841 - living in Bosherston, aged 20, servant, surname spelt Llewelen. Census reference given correctly on FMP as HO107/1443/2 folio 7 page 9. Ancestry incorrectly say it's folio 8 page 9.
Think this is the marriage of the 1851/1861 James and Elizabeth. (Image on FMP's Pembrokeshire marriages dataset.)
22 February 1846 in Carew. James Llewhellin, labourer, and Elizabeth Lewis.
There are Llewhellin births with mother's maiden name Lewis in Pembroke registration district on the GRO's own website which match James and Elizabeth's children in the 1851 and 1861 census. Bosherston and Carew are both in Pembroke registration district.

Pam

Thanks for the help but i’m just going to give up.
I don’t need snobbery when i already explained to you more than once that i can’t access the info you’re asking me for on my phone. So i gave you what i could and that’s still wrong. 🙄
I’m not sure what 1901 etc census has to do with anything because my family weren’t in the UK at that time.
I get that you’re trying to help but do far it’s just a repetition of info i already know. My post was more asking if anyone is familiar with this family who knows of a connection. I wasn’t asking people to look anything up for me. And now it’s become a huge chore when i was mostly just putting it out there for people to contact me in future if they come across it because they’re connected to these families.
Anyway, i’m done with this.

[suemalings]

Sue, it'll be quicker to just ask you than for me to try to find the entry , but do you mean 1909, or have you made a typo and the date should be 1809?

Pam

No Pam it is 1909. There is also a divorce between a John and Emily, but looking closer I see it is in 1905. in Bedford. I guess Pawlett is not such an unusual name as I originally though. But it seems that the original poster has all the details we can all find now.