How much would it have cost a wife to divorce her husband in 1900 for bigamy? Was this an option only open to those with money, or was it common?
Results 1 to 7 of 7
Thread: Divorce in 1900. Expensive?
-
15-02-2010, 12:44 AM #1Philip IGuest
Divorce in 1900. Expensive?
-
15-02-2010, 7:50 AM #2
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Location
- Wakefield, West Yorkshire
- Posts
- 626
It would not have been easy for a wife to divorce her husband in 1900.
She would have to not only prove his adultery, but also one other marital offence.
In addition divorce was still expensive (even though it was cheaper than in earlier years) with no legal aid.
Cheers
GuyAs we have gained from the past, we owe the future a debt, which we pay by sharing today.
-
15-02-2010, 7:54 AM #3raineshoeGuest
We had a divorce in 1888 and from the documents it was very expensive. The pair concerned were basically labourers so I don't know how they afforded it, although the lady that Henry ran off with was clearly a little richer so whether she paid I don't know. I was surprised that they hadn't just disappeared into the night and popped up somewhere as man and wife. Their marriage certificate states they are both widowers and I know they divorced.
So it does seem it is open to all if they had the money and could prove the case.
Incidentally, if you go the National Archives site there are loads of divorces listed so I think it was more common than you think. It was certainly more common than I ever thought.
-
06-11-2013, 10:38 PM #4
- Join Date
- Nov 2013
- Location
- Suffolk
- Posts
- 7
Just having a browse around as I'm new here and I noticed this thread.
In case anyone is still interested in this subject, it was possible in those days to apply to the Court (the High Court of Justice then) for your divorce to be dealt with "Informa Pauperis". It would then be considered and if accepted this meant that the Court fees were waived. This must have been a big saving although of course you still had to pay your Barrister and Solicitor. My 3x Great Aunt was divorced in this way by her husband in 1906.
-
08-11-2013, 3:48 PM #5DorothySandraGuest
-
24-06-2015, 4:04 PM #6
- Join Date
- Jun 2015
- Location
- Holborn
- Posts
- 234
One thing I specialize in is divorce as an archivist. Divorce wasn't common then, and it was hugely expensive. In the 1920s the cost was lowered but not by much, and left it unaffordable to many. A wife would've had to prove adultery and another marital offence, but for a man he only had to prove adultery. Back then, sexism wasn't a thing people found bad and women weren't allowed to vote until 1918.
People were divorced only if it was necessary, and if they could afford it. Divorce carried a stigma, so particularly for women it wasn't desirable to become a divorcee. Whereas nowadays, divorce is much more common than it was. A divorce was about £300, roughly £29,000 in today's terms. After the 1920s, it was around £250.
Usually in court cases back then, people weren't represented. Barristers and/or solicitors were quite rare to find then, but as divorce became more commonly used the need grew for them. Legal aid was rare anyhow.
A bigamous marriage was not legal, therefore a divorce wasn't needed. I think he/she wasted her money!
-
25-06-2015, 6:49 AM #7
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- wales
- Posts
- 3,441
https://www.parliament.uk/business/pu...fe/split-pairs
Reflects the huge change that has occurred since 1900 (and well remember the Princess Margaret furore!)"dyfal donc a dyr y garreg"
Helping you trace your British Family History & British Genealogy.
All times are GMT. The time now is 7:11 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5
Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.
Bookmarks