Hi all
Can anyone tell me how to find out where people suffering from TB were treated in the 1930's/1940's please?
Probabley in or around the Sutton, Surrey or south London areas
Thank you
Helen
Results 1 to 10 of 21
Thread: TB in the 1930's/1940's
-
19-06-2008, 7:08 PM #1helen57Guest
TB in the 1930's/1940's
-
19-06-2008, 7:19 PM #2Jan1954Guest
Possibly the Beddington Corner Isolation Hospital in Wallington.
The National Archives hold some details.
-
19-06-2008, 7:31 PM #3
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- Kent
- Posts
- 16,792
Have a look at the Hospital Records Database
https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/h...rds/search.asp
For example there's...
Downs Hospital for Children, Sutton
Milford Hospital, Godalming
-
19-06-2008, 8:02 PM #4helen57Guest
Thank you Jan and Peter
I'm off now to do some hunting
Thanks again
Helen
-
19-06-2008, 8:16 PM #5
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- Kent
- Posts
- 16,792
I didn't mention one big one -
King Edward VII Hospital, Midhurst (about 7 miles from Sutton).
-
17-10-2008, 5:31 PM #6
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Location
- Norfolk
- Posts
- 1,359
TB was similar to the terminal illnesses of today. It often killed people slowly. Families of sufferers were advised to keep away from them for fear of infecting themselves.
Nowadays TB can be cured but in Victorian times, it was a killer. Imagine being a sufferer of the illness for a while (ie a few years) before you died as it took time to kill someone, and they were probably subject to being bedridden and such for a while before that.
Ben
-
17-10-2008, 6:15 PM #7MutleyGuest
I am not sure but I think back then the "Royal Free Hospital" treated TB and also St. Thomas's Hospital in South London. I seem to remember, somewhere seeing a picture of the TB Department at St. Thomas.
-
18-10-2008, 4:21 PM #8DavranGuest
How strange! My father was invalided out of the Navy in 1942 suffering from TB. He made a full recovery, but I never thought to ask where he was treated - I think I assumed it was the local hospital (the family home was in Lincolnshire). I believe he had to have a lung collapsed during the treatment and a drain put in.
Unfortunately, he died last year, so I can't ask him about it. I imagine my mother would know, though it was before they were married.
-
18-10-2008, 5:46 PM #9Wilkes_mlGuest
My great grandfather did of TB in 1927 aged just 35 years. He died at home, so did they go to hospital, then return home when the end was near?
I have a photo of him with his two children in the garden - probably taken not long before he died. I hadn't even considered he may have been hospitalised.
-
18-10-2008, 5:50 PM #10
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Location
- Norfolk
- Posts
- 1,359
Hi
It is possible that they may have gone home when the end was near. As said, TB was a disease that killed people slowly and painfully. If he was sent home, this it is likely that he would be kept in a warm bedroom away from other family members for risk of catching it themselves.
Ben
Helping you trace your British Family History & British Genealogy.
All times are GMT. The time now is 9:04 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5
Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.
Bookmarks