Father's name

[Megan Roberts]

Would anyone like to hazard a guess at the name of the father from this baptism in 1717?


https://www.british-genealogy.com/extensions/uploads/1f3a2eac-0c52-457e-bb65-0ec1802f2385.png


Thanks

[smj7290]

It says:
"Catherine the daughter of Mr Kawlsy James was baptised August 5th.".

[Allan F Sparrow]

*anley James. The * looks like K, so it probably isn't!

Is there anything comparable in the rest of the document?

[Lesley Robertson]

Rawley?

[Megan Roberts]

*anley James. The * looks like K, so it probably isn't!

Is there anything comparable in the rest of the document?

I will have to have a look.

[Megan Roberts]

I am inclined to think that it is something *anley, on the basis that the "n" looks like the "n" in Catherine.

[Allan F Sparrow]

I am now wondering if it might be Lanley, though Rawley also looks possible, because of the kink in the link between the "n" and the l.

[christanel]

The 'e' at the end of Catherine, in James and the second last letter of the surname look the same to me. Rawley?

Christina

[Megan Roberts]

I think that I shall just have to leave a few spaces with alternatives.

Thank you to all who contributed.

[Megan Roberts]

I have just got to the top of the page in 1723 and found the following:


https://www.british-genealogy.com/extensions/uploads/e79af82d-3130-4f73-bbb7-e3360e071f89.png

If you look across to the right hand side you can see "Roger", so the first letter of the chap's name is definitely "R".

So that's one lot of ** deleted!!

[emeltee]

Hi,

The baptism is on FreeReg2 and gives the father's name as Rawley James

Emeltee

[Megan Roberts]

I know that the register is on FreeReg, but I have a real problem with some of their transcriptions.

If you search "Gambold" "Cardiganshire" "Baptisms" "1669" - they have 1 result for a Jacob Gambold. It isn't Jacob it is John:


https://www.british-genealogy.com/extensions/uploads/3a24db16-8b98-4d68-84ad-b8d079b4a799.png

That is just one example.

[gasser]

Hi Megan

I think emeltee was just confirming what you yourself had already deduced in your post 12, with the letter "R" written for Roger being the same as is written in your first original post with the name that appears to be Mr Rawley James.
However, I do understand your frustrations with translations from sources and it is always a good idea to 'kick' it around on forums like this, to see what others think.
I love challenges....so please post more if you have them!!
best wishes, Gail

[Megan Roberts]

Emeltee,

My apologies for badly wording my response. It was not meant to be ungrateful, or churlish, but I can see that it was. Gail, has summed up my view far better than I did.

Gail: thank you for your gentle but fair critique of my response. Don't worry this register has more than its fair share of challenges, so I am sure that I shall be back to pester you some more.

Megan

[emeltee]

Hi Megan,

No offence taken. I was just trying to confirm the name using another source. However it just goes to show that you should never take any transcription for granted and should always try to look at the original whenever possible.

Emeltee

[Ladkyis]

Can I just say, with my moderating hat on, that you lot are just about the best members any forum could hope to have. We Moderators chunter along in the background, making sure that spammers get stopped at source and redirecting new members to the sections that will give them the most, while our, most experienced members are out here on the front line self-moderating and doing their utmost to help wherever they can.
We really do appreciate it. Thank you

[Pam Downes]

I'd like to second everything Ladkyis said. :smile5:

Regarding FreeREG transcriptions, I don't know if they're 'double-keyed' like FreeBMD is, though I guess not, so therefore you're relying on one person's interpretation of what's written.
I remember transcribing one PR (not for FreeREG) and, trying in my eagerness to be a perfectionist, I used to transcribe one week and then a couple of weeks later I would go back and check my work as well as having another attempt at the names that had stumped me first time round. One particular checking week I looked at an entry and said one name but my original transcription was a completely different name. I was completely flabbergasted as to how I'd interpreted the name so differently the second time. (I can't remember which one was correct, so don't ask!)

So it is easy to get things wrong, especially if you're on page five of difficult writing. :smile5: The good thing about FreeREG is that, like FreeBMD (and presumably FreeCEN) they willingly accept corrections. I sent one off last night and have already received a 'thank you and error corrected' message.

Pam