Mandie
31-08-2005, 10:30 AM
I've been spending a lot of time re-evaluating all the evidence I've collected in my search for the Bell and Watts family trees, and I don't know how to move forward with this particular one.
What I know
James Bell was born c1788.
He married Margaret, who was born c1787. I've calculated they could have married anytime between 1804 and 1826. But as to where, I have no idea
James was primarily working as a cordwainer.
1841 census James and family reside in Pittington, County Durham (He is stated as being born in the county).
1851 census James and family reside at Lodge Hill, Durham (James is said to be born in Durham, County Durham).
1861 census James and youngest son, Aaron, are living at Bell's Villa in Durham (James now originates from Scotland) [Ref: RG9/3742 f41 p44].
James likely died in 1866 (I'm waiting on the death certificate).
Things aren't too bad if he is from Durham, as I can hunt in the parish registers for him (which was my plan). But the 1861 census entry has thrown me, because if he was born in Scotland where do I begin looking? Is the 1861 census likely to be more accurate than the previous two?
Any ideas?
What I know
James Bell was born c1788.
He married Margaret, who was born c1787. I've calculated they could have married anytime between 1804 and 1826. But as to where, I have no idea
James was primarily working as a cordwainer.
1841 census James and family reside in Pittington, County Durham (He is stated as being born in the county).
1851 census James and family reside at Lodge Hill, Durham (James is said to be born in Durham, County Durham).
1861 census James and youngest son, Aaron, are living at Bell's Villa in Durham (James now originates from Scotland) [Ref: RG9/3742 f41 p44].
James likely died in 1866 (I'm waiting on the death certificate).
Things aren't too bad if he is from Durham, as I can hunt in the parish registers for him (which was my plan). But the 1861 census entry has thrown me, because if he was born in Scotland where do I begin looking? Is the 1861 census likely to be more accurate than the previous two?
Any ideas?