cotswold mike
04-07-2012, 10:11 PM
The main burden of this query is fostering and adoption in the 19th century, please excuse a couple of “off topic” side issues.
According to his Army records, James HAMELTON (my ancestor) was born about 1798 in Tyrwent, Monaghan, Ireland. Unfortunately I cannot find such a place, or any record of it. Perhaps there has been a transcription error or even an original recording error on the Army's part. Does anyone have any idea what the name of the place should be? James enlisted in the 12th Royal Lancers on 10 Sept 1818, and was attested in Sept 14, 1818. He was murdered in Hampton Court Barracks on 21 Jun, 1838 by Private John Rickey.
James married an Ellan, possibly Ellan Flynn, possibly in Donneraile, Cork in 1833. They had 2 daughters, Jane (1835) and Margaret (1838). It has been suggested that, it was customary, for the Army to encourage a widow to marry another member of the Regiment, but I have been unable to find any such marriage. Would the new born Margaret be an impediment? Especially since soon after the murder, the Regiment were preparing to go to South Africa where they spent some time before moving on to India. Alternatively, did she return to Ireland.
From Dorset OPCs, we have the baptism of James daughter Jane (my ancestor): "8 Nov 1835; Jane HAMELTON (HAMILTON); daughter of James HAMELTON (Sergt. 12th Royal Lancers) & Ellan HAMELTON; Abode - Weymouth Barrracks". What happened to Jane after her father was murdered? Her mother is now a widow with a new born child, Margaret. If Ellan follows her late husband’s regiment to South Africa, would it be better (safer) for the Jane to remain in England? Has she been fostered or adopted and is now the 6-year-old Jane Cox living in Weymouth in 1841. Jane Cox married a George Frederick Cox. The birth certificate of their daughter Amy Bassano Cox records Jane as "Jane Cox formerly HAMILTON". Amy married a William Thick and their son (my father) was christened Arthur HAMILTON Thick.
The evidence that the girl Jane HAMELTON became Jane Cox is strong but is arguably circumstantial. In the mid 19th century was it normal to record fostering and/or adoption in any regularised manner?
And what of Jane’s mother and younger sister, Margaret?
Any help with any of these issues would be greatly appreciated.
According to his Army records, James HAMELTON (my ancestor) was born about 1798 in Tyrwent, Monaghan, Ireland. Unfortunately I cannot find such a place, or any record of it. Perhaps there has been a transcription error or even an original recording error on the Army's part. Does anyone have any idea what the name of the place should be? James enlisted in the 12th Royal Lancers on 10 Sept 1818, and was attested in Sept 14, 1818. He was murdered in Hampton Court Barracks on 21 Jun, 1838 by Private John Rickey.
James married an Ellan, possibly Ellan Flynn, possibly in Donneraile, Cork in 1833. They had 2 daughters, Jane (1835) and Margaret (1838). It has been suggested that, it was customary, for the Army to encourage a widow to marry another member of the Regiment, but I have been unable to find any such marriage. Would the new born Margaret be an impediment? Especially since soon after the murder, the Regiment were preparing to go to South Africa where they spent some time before moving on to India. Alternatively, did she return to Ireland.
From Dorset OPCs, we have the baptism of James daughter Jane (my ancestor): "8 Nov 1835; Jane HAMELTON (HAMILTON); daughter of James HAMELTON (Sergt. 12th Royal Lancers) & Ellan HAMELTON; Abode - Weymouth Barrracks". What happened to Jane after her father was murdered? Her mother is now a widow with a new born child, Margaret. If Ellan follows her late husband’s regiment to South Africa, would it be better (safer) for the Jane to remain in England? Has she been fostered or adopted and is now the 6-year-old Jane Cox living in Weymouth in 1841. Jane Cox married a George Frederick Cox. The birth certificate of their daughter Amy Bassano Cox records Jane as "Jane Cox formerly HAMILTON". Amy married a William Thick and their son (my father) was christened Arthur HAMILTON Thick.
The evidence that the girl Jane HAMELTON became Jane Cox is strong but is arguably circumstantial. In the mid 19th century was it normal to record fostering and/or adoption in any regularised manner?
And what of Jane’s mother and younger sister, Margaret?
Any help with any of these issues would be greatly appreciated.