BeeE586
09-11-2007, 10:51 PM
I have a problem with this name. In 1820 Ann Garner was married NTT Austerfield to George Rimmington, but census 1841 – 1861 has them living NTT Harworth. A son, Joseph, was baptised in 1815 NTT Blyth to an Ann Garner – no father named.
In 1841 Ann is 50, not born in County
In 1851 she is 63, born LIN Gainsborough
In 1861 she is 74, born LIN Gainsborough
She is buried in Harworth in 1862, aged 74 so a birthdate of c1788 is suggested, but a wide search of IGI, various indexes and a good many registers, both C of E and non-Conformist, both sides of the Trent has not revealed a baptism.
However, in 1814 a Thomas GARNETT is married to Ann WARD in Gainsborough, and sadly Thomas dies shortly afterwards leaving a widow Ann GARNETT, so I wonder – could this be my Ann. She was not declared widow when she married George, but no status at all was declared, and can this tie in with the son baptized in 1815 ? If this is my Ann, is she really Garner or Garnett ?
My Rimmington's are established in north Notts. back to the late 1600's and so far as I can judge have no connection with the Lincolnshire families of this name.
All comments and suggestions welcome and if anyone is researching these families I would be pleased to hear.
Eileen
In 1841 Ann is 50, not born in County
In 1851 she is 63, born LIN Gainsborough
In 1861 she is 74, born LIN Gainsborough
She is buried in Harworth in 1862, aged 74 so a birthdate of c1788 is suggested, but a wide search of IGI, various indexes and a good many registers, both C of E and non-Conformist, both sides of the Trent has not revealed a baptism.
However, in 1814 a Thomas GARNETT is married to Ann WARD in Gainsborough, and sadly Thomas dies shortly afterwards leaving a widow Ann GARNETT, so I wonder – could this be my Ann. She was not declared widow when she married George, but no status at all was declared, and can this tie in with the son baptized in 1815 ? If this is my Ann, is she really Garner or Garnett ?
My Rimmington's are established in north Notts. back to the late 1600's and so far as I can judge have no connection with the Lincolnshire families of this name.
All comments and suggestions welcome and if anyone is researching these families I would be pleased to hear.
Eileen