Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Cause of death

  1. #1
    melsibob
    Guest

    Default Cause of death

    I have received a copy of a death certificate for my uncle today and was shocked at the level of suffering he must have endured. I wonder if diagnosed today would he have been treated and therefore survived to live to a ripe old age? The death certifcate tells me the cause of death was a) Uraemia, b) Amyloid disease of the kidney, c) Tuberculosis of the spine. He was 28 at the time of his death in 1930.

  2. #2
    Brick wall demolition expert!
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Queensland Australia
    Posts
    2,359

    Default

    That is sad, our ancestors would prob have suffered greatly from things that today are quite readily treated..I have a death cert for a 3 yr old who died in 1841 apparently from complications from teething!

  3. #3
    Reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    16,792

    Default

    The death certifcate tells me the cause of death was a) Uraemia, b) Amyloid disease of the kidney, c) Tuberculosis of the spine
    Is there a doctor on the house?

    Isn't that basically just one condition? (c) caused (b) which caused (a)?

  4. #4
    kaysii
    Guest

    Default

    Amyloidosis of the kidney is often caused by a chronic infection or inflammatory condition of which TB would fit the bill. Renal failure will result from amyloid and uraemia or the build up of urea in the blood will occur and will eventually kill you.

    kaysii

  5. #5
    melsibob
    Guest

    Default

    Thanks for your responses and added information - however I still would like to know if modern medicine would have allowed him a longer life or was the infection likley to have been so severe the outcome is ievitable even today?

  6. #6
    kaysii
    Guest

    Default

    If his TB had been treated he might have avoided getting amyloidosis in the first case. Amyloidosis is not an infection but the depositing of a protein in the organs of the body.
    TB treatment with multiple drug therapy was not available in the 1930s but (unless he had a resistant strain) is easily treatable today.
    Although these days the renal failure could be managed, the amyloid protein is also deposited in other organs and can cause failure in the heart and liver for example. People with amyloidosis are likely to have a reduced lifespan despite modern medicine, how much is partly dependent on the type of amyloidosis and the underlying condition that caused it.
    This article gives more details
    https://www.medicinenet.com/amyloidosis/article.htm
    This is less technical
    https://www.amyloidsupportgroup.co.uk/id1.html
    kaysii

  7. #7
    DorothySandra
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by melsibob View Post
    Thanks for your responses and added information - however I still would like to know if modern medicine would have allowed him a longer life or was the infection likley to have been so severe the outcome is ievitable even today?
    TB is both preventable (from inoculation) and curable. Antibiotics cure a great many infections that used to kill people - including the infections arising from teething and any kind of wound. A broken leg or a scratched finger could be fatal before penicillin was discovered.

    Clean water and vitamins are two more things that we take for granted now, but lack of these caused many illnesses and disabilities.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Select a file: