Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Famous for offering help & advice
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    manchester
    Posts
    1,438

    Default Marriage requirements

    Would a person getting married in 1940 needed to have produced their birth cert? They were born c1920.

  2. #2
    MarkJ
    Guest

    Default

    I don't think it is a legal requirement to produce one - but some church officials like to see evidence of baptism for example.

    I got married in 1986 and didn't have to produce anything.

  3. #3
    malcolm99
    Guest

    Default

    I don't know, but everyone had to carry an Identity Card in 1940 and if that was sufficient for the police I suspect it was accepted everywhere for most purposes.

  4. #4
    malcolm99
    Guest

    Default

    As far as I can see a marriage in 1940 between 2 people resident in England would have been carried out under the Marriage and Registration Act 1856. Section 2 of that Act didn't require a birth certificate to be produced, see: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/...ion/II/enacted

    The next general legislation was the 1949 Marriage Act and that made no mention of birth certificates being required:
    https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/...ion/27/enacted
    Last edited by malcolm99; 01-05-2012 at 6:56 PM. Reason: added 'general legislation'

  5. #5
    Mutley
    Guest

    Default

    I was married in 1982, I remember going to see the registrar on my own to book the date. I also remember being asked our father's names. Spouse was adopted so I said "don't know" and father unknown was recorded. Spouse was not worried about it so it was left as I'd said.

    If I could go back again, after doing family history, I could now tell them who his father was.
    However, if in 1982 I did not produce documents, I doubt they were necessary in 1940.

  6. #6
    Reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    16,792

    Default

    Surely an adopted person's legal father is the adoptive father.

  7. #7
    Mutley
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mutley View Post
    I was married in 1982, I remember going to see the registrar on my own to book the date. I also remember being asked our father's names. Spouse was adopted so I said "don't know" and father unknown was recorded. Spouse was not worried about it so it was left as I'd said.

    If I could go back again, after doing family history, I could now tell them who his father was.


    However, if in 1982 I did not produce documents, I doubt they were necessary in 1940.
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter Goodey View Post
    Surely an adopted person's legal father is the adoptive father.
    Tis so.
    But I did not have or did not seem to need either his birth certificate or his adoption papers and certainly did not have them with me, both were dead, neither were mine. I had no idea... back then.
    My answer, therefore, was "don't know" and column 7 and 8 has only a dash!

    My point was, and as you well know Peter because we have this question often, the information in the father's column is that what was verbally given at the time and is not necessarily the truth.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Select a file: