Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 32
  1. #21
    Knowledgeable and helpful
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Victoria, Australia
    Posts
    997

    Default


    Brilliant Doug I think that has definitely solved the puzzle. I know the Nellie birth is correct (she died same qrtr) as my cousin's mother was the next child in 1922.

    The other one looks correct also because they were married in Southwark.

    I knew there would be someone out there who could think logically about this. Of course I was thinking I needed the 1921 census but forgot the births criteria.

    Well done ..... I am quite satisfied with that solution.

    Now I MUST get out it in the sun and pull some weeds I sure need the exercise having sat at the computer for nearly 8 hours!!!!

    Good Grief.

  2. #22
    Knowledgeable and helpful
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Victoria, Australia
    Posts
    997

    Default

    Yeh.....just read your post Pam. That would be brilliant if you can find the RIGHT girl.

    Don't rush I can sit here a little longer!!

  3. #23
    Super Moderator - Completely bonkers and will never change.
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    England
    Posts
    9,636

    Default


    Will post this bit first, then I can type the census entry at my own pace, and you can get on with the weeding while I do.

    Baptism -
    Parish of St Marylebone
    page number 109 entry number 232
    9 May 1884
    Amelia Alice Law
    daughter of George and Sarah. George's occupation is tailor.
    Clergy - G. E. Thomas
    Date of birth - 10 Sept 1882

    London Metropolitan Archives reference: P89/MRY1, Item 071

    I know I have the right family in 1891 because of George's occupation and the baptism of a brother.
    Pam
    Last edited by Pam Downes; 24-10-2009 at 4:06 AM. Reason: Added LMA reference

  4. #24
    Knowledgeable and helpful
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Victoria, Australia
    Posts
    997

    Default



    See how excited I am!!

    So you really think that Amelia Alice turned her name around to Alice Amelia? I wait with bated breath to see what she was called in 1891 . Used Alice Amelia in all the certificates.So inconsiderate of her really.
    I wonder why, maybe a joke between her and her cousin(?) the other Alice Amelia.

    Lost all interest in the weeding...far too exhausted from chasing Alice all around London.

  5. #25
    Keyboard86
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Procat View Post
    Ancestry has the following births for Archer with mother Law:

    Caroline 1912 June Q Southwark 1d 158

    James 1912 June Q Southwark 1d 158

    Florence A 1914 June Q Southwark 1d 131

    Ada E 1915 Sep Q 1915 Southwark 1d 123

    Marcel A 1915 Mar Q Croydon 2a 617

    And this for Symons with mother Law

    Nellie 1914 Mar Q St Marylebone 1a 911

    Purely circumstantial but I think we have two separate couples - obviously without the full names of the mothers we are surmising.

    Do any of these names fit with other information?
    Just a word of caution the Archer/Law combination for Southwark is still ongoing until at least 1930.

    Hope this is solved for you.

    Best Regards
    Keyboard86

  6. #26
    Knowledgeable and helpful
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Victoria, Australia
    Posts
    997

    Default

    Hi Keyboard....do you mean Births?

    Well that settles it ........two different ladies. I wish Mrs Archer had used her baptised name and not fiddled with it.

    I shouldn't talk though my mother was Marjorie Alice but was always known as Alice..... except on her marriage certificate!! Naughty Amelia so inconsiderate.

  7. #27
    Procat
    Guest

    Default

    I think what Keyboard is alluding to is that there may be more than one couple with the Archer/Law combination - and not necessarily the one we have been chasing.

  8. #28
    Super Moderator - Completely bonkers and will never change.
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    England
    Posts
    9,636

    Default

    1891
    RG12/94 folio 134 page 64
    24 Great Barlow Street, Marylebone
    George Law, 42, tailor, Marylebone
    Johannah (sic), wife, 37, tailoress, Cornwall Lands End
    Henry, son, 19, porter, Marylebone
    Caroline, daur, 17, needlewoman, Marylebone
    Richard, son, 9, scholar, Marylebone
    Alice, daur, 7, scholar, Marylebone
    Elizabeth, daur, 5, scholar, Marylebone

    The family might be good at sewing but not so hot on maths.
    Richard's birth registered September quarter 1880. His baptism (same day as Amelia's) -

    Baptism -
    Parish of St Marylebone
    page number 109 entry number 231
    9 May 1884
    Richard Walter Francis
    son of George and Sarah. George's occupation is tailor.
    Address - 1 Manchester Mews North
    Clergy - G. E. Thomas
    Date of birth - 28 June 1880

    Baptism of Elizabeth
    Parish of St Marylebone
    page number 220 entry number 26
    24 January 1886
    Elizabeth Sarah
    son of George and Sarah. George's occupation is tailor.
    Address - 1 Manchester Mews North
    Clergy - E R Hollings
    Date of birth - 19 December 1885

    Can't find baptisms for Henry or Caroline.
    By the way, use caution with the LMA reference number previously quoted. It may refer purely to the refs used between LMA and A*, as there is a different reference used in the LMA catalogue. Though that may refer to the LMA film number and not the reference for the original registers.

    I think this is George's death registration, aged 46, March quarter 1895 Marylebone district.
    Makes seaching for the family in 1901 slightly more difficult.
    This may be Alice.
    RG13/1238 folio 125 page 33
    1 The Avenue, Hornsey
    Alice Law, servant, s, 17, general servant (domestic), London St Johns Wood
    (St Johns Wood is 'Marylebone way' )
    No Amelia Laws seem to check out.
    Pam

  9. #29
    Knowledgeable and helpful
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Victoria, Australia
    Posts
    997

    Default

    Oh No!!

    Just as well I am not searching for Alice Archer then. Funny how I could not find Arthur or Alice Archer in 1911. No births recorded for them either until 1912.

    I could just find single Alice who we think now is a different person.

    Thanks for all the help. That's Saturday gone!!

    Marj.

  10. #30
    Knowledgeable and helpful
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Victoria, Australia
    Posts
    997

    Default

    Thank you so much Pam, that is so wonderful. I am sure you have the right girl now.
    I think you also have the right girl in 1901 as in 1911 she is also a servant aged 28 born Marylebone.
    Great work , thank you so much for all that typing.

    Now I will get to work tracing the family back and tell my 6th cousin x times removed that it can only be completely proven by purchase of the marriage certificate to confirm name of father and occupation and if deceased.

    Looks good to me however.

    Thanks again
    Marj.
    PS By the way isn't it very early in the morning in Sussex?
    Last edited by Dargie; 24-10-2009 at 5:32 AM. Reason: question

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Select a file: