A couple of times recently I've come across the suggestion that a woman described in a census as a dressmaker or seamstress might have been using this as a euphemism, since she was involved in something much less wholesome. Is there any evidence to support this idea, please?
Arthur
Results 1 to 10 of 13
Thread: Dressmakers and Seamstresses
Hybrid View
-
03-06-2006, 8:18 PM #1
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- West Yorkshire
- Posts
- 1,729
Dressmakers and Seamstresses
-
03-06-2006, 9:46 PM #2
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- Kent
- Posts
- 16,792
Somewhere I've seen a reference which suggests that some prostitutes described themselves (or were described) as dressmakers. Unfortunately, I can't lay my hands on it at the moment.
I rather suspect that Chinese whispers and the usual processes of urban myth have turned this observation on its head and transformed it into the claim that many people described as dressmakers were actually prostitutes.
This is of course not the same thing at all.
On the other hand, you could try the 1881 census which is indexed on occupation and try searching for 'prostitute' or 'common prostitute'. You'll see that many of them were in institutions of one sort or another but others who weren't didn't seem worried about calling a spade a spade.
-
04-06-2006, 4:49 PM #3
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- West Yorkshire
- Posts
- 1,729
Thank you, Peter, for your helpful comments. I'd been hoping someone might come up with something contemporary rather than an unsubstantiated modern assertion.
However, none of this can ever really answer the question for any specific girl: was she just a dressmaker, or was she a prostitute as well? Many of the ones I've found were unmarried girls living with their parents, and in general I would think they would have less need or opportunity to supplement their income with prostitution. Other living arrangements may arouse greater suspicion, but short of finding court reports etc, maybe it's something we'll never know for sure.
Thanks again,
Arthur
-
05-06-2006, 10:07 AM #4Burrow DiggerGuest
Thousands of women stayed with their parents - often to look after them. Many of these women never married at all. It was probably the ONLY way the elderly parents could stay OUT of the workhouses.
Nowadays do the sons and daughters look after their parents?? No they pack them away in old folks homes (euphemistically called seniors homes) and then forget about them.
BD
-
05-06-2006, 12:23 PM #5WirralGuestOriginally Posted by Burrow Digger
It might be difficult at times, but worth every minute. Especially for me as I have a resident genealogy expert "on tap"!
-
11-01-2009, 5:51 PM #6dagianGuest
What did they really do?
Also been researching this topic. Most sites I have visited state the same (Definition Of Terms Used On Census Returns):
'Dressmaker ~ the occupation of 'dressmaker' was commonly given by prostitutes.'
It appears that the majority favour the above - still unconvinced myself. My ancestors, in the early 1800s, were Catholics (not sure if this would discount the possibility).
-
11-01-2009, 7:01 PM #7dagianGuest
Looking at the family in question - possible that Dress Maker was a euphenism.
The male members were all either Shoe Maker, Ap Shoe Maker plus a Pauper. The females were a 20 year old Dress Maker and a 14 year old Ap Dress Maker. Obviously not a lot of money in the household.
The 20 year old Dress Maker went from North Wales to Liverpool and then returned quickly to get married before having a child 7 months later. She was a Catholic girl and married in St Winifred's Chapel, Holywell (a famous pilgrim location) so there was obviously haste before a 'bump' appeared.
-
11-01-2009, 7:10 PM #8dagianGuest
There was obviously great importance placed on such women marrying as quickly as possible. The penalties for 'Lewdness and Bastardy' were quite draconian, invariably sentences included Hard Labour.
-
11-01-2009, 7:25 PM #9
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- Kent
- Posts
- 16,792
You cannot assume that if most internet sources say something that it must be the truth. The same duff information circulates around and around being copied as it goes.
The position is as I described it in message 2 above. In a small number of cases, people who were known from other sources to be prostitutes, described themselves as dressmakers.
This does not mean that all or even many people who described themselves as dressmakers were prostitutes.
99.9% of dressmakers were dressmakers.
-
05-03-2009, 3:28 PM #10
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Location
- Norfolk
- Posts
- 1,359
Hi
I do not believe either that any female ancestors of mine who were tailoresses or dressmakers were prostitutes, and I am sceptical that girls with such occupations on censuses who were really on the game. Very few I think.
My great grandmothers two sisters born 1894 and 1904 were dressmakers. One even made dresses for Royalty. Their mum born in 1863 was a Tailoress in the 1881 census aged 17 alongside her sister who was 13 at the time.
Their 1813 born fathers mother Ann born 1777 was a dressmaker in the 1851 census as was her elder daughter Elizabeth born 1809. So the clothesmaking gene must run in the family here. Definately no prostitution there at all!!
Ben
Helping you trace your British Family History & British Genealogy.
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:26 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5
Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.
Bookmarks