+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Settled in very nicely!
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Oakville, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    3,460
    Thanks
    575
    Thanked 135 Times in 102 Posts

    Default A term from the Probate Register.

    I have a phrase from the "National Probate Calendar of Wills and Administrations" that probate was granted to one of the Executors.

    The phrase is "Probate being granted under certain Limitations". This was granted to the father of the deceased. At the time of her death, she was married and had 4 children aged 9-14. At the time of her death, or shortly thereafter, her husband was an inmate at a Lunatic Asylum. The wife and her husband died in 1883 [less than 7months apart].

    My assumption is that the "certain Limitations" was in reference to and concerned the care of the 4 minor children. Am I correct?

    Colin

  2. #2
    Reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    12,656
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 878 Times in 816 Posts

    Default

    Am I correct?
    No.

    The probate calendar is an index and you can't possibly guess what the limitations were or why they were imposed without obtaining a copy of the will and grant.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Peter Goodey For This Useful Post:

    Colin Rowledge (09-07-2012)

  4. #3
    Logical, laid back and lovely. Mary Anne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    705
    Thanks
    37
    Thanked 23 Times in 15 Posts

    Default

    I've just had four entries in a row from the National Probate Calendar that said "Probate being granted under certain Limitations".

    ALL were for people who had never married and had no children. All of the decedents were reported to have estates less than £300.

    Interestingly, these were all probated in London in 1875, many years after the deaths, which were all in Canada, in 1843, 1865, 1866, and 1872, respectively. Administration was granted to a distant relation who was at the time residing in England, and he was acting on behalf of the three brothers of the deceased, all of whom were then living in Canada.

    I can only think there was some legal need for these estates to be resolved in 1875, perhaps relating to property? What the limitations were will remain for another day, if and when I order the probate documents.


    Mary Anne

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Select a file: