+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Has a well deserved spectacular aura Sandra Parker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Darwin, Australia
    Posts
    798
    Thanks
    54
    Thanked 98 Times in 61 Posts

    Default James must have married someone, but who?

    James Howlett married Esther Reeve on 21st May 1850 at All Saints Dickleburgh. It would appear that she died in 1853 ( 1853 Mar Q Vol 4B Page 174). She appeared as his wife in 1851 census.
    In 1855, son William was born, followed by Elijah, 1859, Eliza, 1860 and Harriet,1861.
    The 1861 census has James with wife Mary Anne, shown as aged 40, James as 32. By 1871, she had reverted to being 44, to his 46.
    I can find a marriage for a James Howlett in Jun Q 1862 Depwade 4b 3(1?7?)3 but no wife (Free BMD & FMP) and another Dec 1863 Depwade 4b 607, but definitely no Mary Anne(only a Sophia and Sarah).

    He must have married someone and someone must have been mother of the 4 children. The family has a long history of getting married in church even though there were fatherless children prior to a marriage, so I was thinking that a 'live together' marriage is probably not the case (although I know by now that I should never presume).
    Would appreciate any thoughts.
    Sandra whose spectacled aura is no help at all!

  2. #2
    Loves to help with queries.
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    England
    Posts
    218
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts

    Default

    Hi Sandra, this sounds like a case of needing some certificates... I'd suggest getting at least one of the children's births and also the marriage and death. A marriage in 1862 sounds too early if Esther's (assumed) death is in 1853.

  3. #3
    Knowledgeable and helpful
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Lancashire
    Posts
    747
    Thanks
    82
    Thanked 207 Times in 201 Posts

    Default

    There are lots of instances of where marriages can't be backed up with a certificate, and there are lots of reasons for that. It could be something so simple as a registery entry being incorrect - I have an instance where one of my grandfather's siblings is shown as having a mother whose maiden name was Jones, when in fact it was Evans - in another case in my tree there is a marriage which was only found by persistant searching because the spelling of his surname was wrong.

    If I was you I would acquire one of the childrens' birth certificates because that will give her maiden name.

    However, there is a marriage of a James Howlett in 1856 registered in Erpingham. Norfolk. From the record it is not definitve as to who the bride is - there are 2 alternatives - but one of them is a Mary Ann Bane.

  4. #4
    Knowledgeable and helpful RonOne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    909
    Thanks
    18
    Thanked 170 Times in 160 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Megan Roberts View Post
    However, there is a marriage of a James Howlett in 1856 registered in Erpingham. Norfolk. From the record it is not definitve as to who the bride is - there are 2 alternatives - but one of them is a Mary Ann Bane.
    Just so you can discount this:

    Marriage: 24 Dec 1856 at North Walsham, Norfolk
    John Ellis, aged 25 - Father: Elijah Ellis
    Mary Ann Bane, aged 22 - Father: Richard Bane

    Marriage: 25 Dec 1856 at North Walsham, Norfolk
    James Howlett, aged 23 - Father: William Howlett
    Eliza Abbs, aged 21 - Father: John Abbs

    Source: Family Search

  5. #5
    Completely bonkers and will never change. Pam Downes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    (now) Sussex, England
    Posts
    4,263
    Thanks
    126
    Thanked 340 Times in 268 Posts

    Default

    I don't know how much of a help this will be but http://tinyurl.com/74r2ofd
    Scroll across to Dickleburgh, baptisms, 1844 -1911.
    Image 2, last entry on page, and image 3 first entry on page.
    Note what's written in the left margin. My reading of that is that William and Elijah were not James' children; and you need to find James' brothers and find which one of them married a Mary Ann(e)/Marianne.

    Eliza and Harriett were baptised 16 Feb 1868 - image 15.

    James' brothers would appear to be William baptised in 1820, and Charles in 1829. When James married Esther he said his father was Joseph, and when a Charles Howlett married Harriet Barber in Dickleburgh in 1857 (image 67 of marriages 1837-1901) he said his father was Joseph, which seems to leave William. I have allegedly checked without success Dickleburgh PRs both for a marriage for William and for death, but do check them yourself to be sure.

    Added: Esther buried Dickleburgh, 4 Feb 1853. Image 44 of burials 1813-1862.

    Further added: Care! There's another William Howlett baptised in Dickleburgh - in 1821. Looks as if he was illegitimate.

    Pam

  6. #6
    Knowledgeable and helpful RonOne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    909
    Thanks
    18
    Thanked 170 Times in 160 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sandra Parker View Post
    James Howlett married Esther Reeve on 21st May 1850 at All Saints Dickleburgh. It would appear that she died in 1853 ( 1853 Mar Q Vol 4B Page 174). She appeared as his wife in 1851 census.
    Esther Howlett
    Abode: Dickleburgh
    Buried: Feb 4 [1853]
    Aged: 26

    - Click here - for burial record

    (Pam's now added the same above )

  7. #7
    Completely bonkers and will never change. Pam Downes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    (now) Sussex, England
    Posts
    4,263
    Thanks
    126
    Thanked 340 Times in 268 Posts

    Default

    RonOne - stop following me around!

    Back to Sandra's question and my ramblings in post #5:
    Most likely marriage seems to be William Howlett and Mary Anne Mullan on the same page, December quarter 1851, Depwade registration district.

    Pam

  8. #8
    Completely bonkers and will never change. Pam Downes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    (now) Sussex, England
    Posts
    4,263
    Thanks
    126
    Thanked 340 Times in 268 Posts

    Default

    So I don't clash with RonOne because we both keep adding bits to our posts

    Submitted entry on IGI - William Howlett and Mary Ann Mullan married 14 October 1851 in Bunwell.
    Bunwell not in list of online registers. Bother!

    Pam

  9. #9
    Loves to help with queries.
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    South Australia
    Posts
    195
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 54 Times in 54 Posts

    Default

    On the 1851 Census there is a Mary Ann Howlett, widow with daughter Harriet with her parents William and Frances Moor (Moore) in Dickleburgh.

    There does not seem to be a birth for Harriet Howlett but there is one for a Harriet Moore in the correct time frame.

    On 23rd November 1846 there is a marriage for Mary Ann Moore daughter of William Moore and Henry Howlet (sic) son of Joseph Howlet. They married at All Saints Church, Dickleburgh.

    Considering that on Elijah and William's baptismal records state that the mother of these children was married to her brother-in-law do you know if James had a brother Henry?

    Cheers
    Judyg

  10. #10
    Knowledgeable and helpful RonOne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    909
    Thanks
    18
    Thanked 170 Times in 160 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by judyg View Post
    On 23rd November 1846 there is a marriage for Mary Ann Moore daughter of William Moore and Henry Howlet (sic) son of Joseph Howlet. They married at All Saints Church, Dickleburgh.
    - Click here - for parish register entry.

    (I'll leave the witnesses to Pam )

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Select a file: