I think I have something fairly unusual in my family and was wondering if any members on here cared to share their views on the matter. My ggg grandfather married in 1851 in Sheffield and produced several children with his wife. However, sometime in 1864 he abandoned her and she ended up spending one month in prison for concealement of birth. Anyway, in the 1871 census he has two new children, seemingly by the housekeeper/servant. They are clearly not married as they carry different surnames on the return. The unusual thing comes from the fact that both children arising from this union carry the fathers surname and not the mothers, which I presumed was usual. He dies in 1874 and in the 1881 census she has married but all of his children from his first marriage and the children from their union are still living with her and her new husband. The enumerator was probably a bit confused by this as he labels the eldest 'son of the above wife' even though he is not actually her child! Sorry, longwinded I know and I still haven't managed to adequately convey the subtleties I fear.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4
Thread: Unusual Bastards
-
10-02-2012 06:46 PM #1Newcomer to Brit-Gen
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
- Location
- Sheffield
- Posts
- 8
- Thanks
- 0
- Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Unusual Bastards
-
11-02-2012 07:46 AM #2Brick wall demolition expert!
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- South Australia
- Posts
- 3,787
- Thanks
- 24
- Thanked 262 Times in 260 Posts
Nice conundrum! Were you looking to find various Family members as well as share views? I'm guessing nothing seemed unusual to offspring until much later in their lives. Like when they took up Genealogical pursuits.
Happy Families
Wendy
Count your Blessings, they'll all add up in the end.
-
11-02-2012 11:18 AM #3Beloved Friend R.I.P.
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Red Deer, Alberta, Canada
- Posts
- 4,761
- Thanks
- 251
- Thanked 27 Times in 24 Posts
I have found that when the children get married/and/or died that their real birth names were used I'am sure that a lot of children simply didn't know what genie routes they had.
-
11-02-2012 11:36 AM #4Newcomer to Brit-Gen
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
- Location
- Sheffield
- Posts
- 8
- Thanks
- 0
- Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have all the family members I need to find. What was stumping me for a while was that I couldn't find the son of this union in the 1911 census. As it turned out he was using both his fathers AND mothers surname! In 1881, 91 & 1901 he was just Woollen but in 1911 he goes and calls himself Woollen Gill!
Here to help you trace your British Family History. Copyright © British-Genealogy.com
A division of and sponsored by Parish Chest Ltd.
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:43 PM.
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.3
Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
A division of and sponsored by Parish Chest Ltd.
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:43 PM.
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.3
Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.

Reply With Quote

Bookmarks