+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Settled in very nicely!
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Oakville, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    2,648
    Thanks
    385
    Thanked 67 Times in 60 Posts

    Default A question about items in a recent Will

    I have the Wills of both parties but cannot fathom the reason for a certain item.

    First the background:
    1] A widower and his unmarried sister, buy a house jointly in c. 1974 - so it is a recent event.

    2] He dies. He doesn't want the property sold in the event of his death prior to his sister, so a provision in his will stipulates that she can reside in the residence. His estate goes through probate as is distributed.

    3] She dies [1983]. Her will stipulates that the residence cannot be sold for 10 years after her death.

    The questions is in 2 parts:
    1] Why was such a provision made in her Will?

    2] What impact would such a provision have on the Estate of her late brother when the property was sold [after 1993] and consequently, the residue legatee.

    I'm not looking for legal advice - I have a solictor in Emgland handling this matter, but it is in early stages.

    I am just curious about the matter and feel that directing it towards this forum may assist others in the future.

    Thanks


    Colin

  2. #2
    Daft Bat and Super Moderator Jan1954's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    At Home in Hertfordshire with Henry....
    Posts
    7,807
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 332 Times in 318 Posts

    Default

    Just after a bit of clarification, Colin....

    3] She dies [1983]. Her will stipulates that the residence cannot be sold for 10 years after her death.
    What was the date of the sister's will? Was it made after the brother had died?

  3. #3
    Settled in very nicely!
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Oakville, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    2,648
    Thanks
    385
    Thanked 67 Times in 60 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jan1954 View Post
    Just after a bit of clarification, Colin....

    What was the date of the sister's will? Was it made after the brother had died?
    In a word - NO!

    Their respective Wills were made shortly after the property was purchased. Hers was done October 21, 1976. This may be a re-write of an earlier Will made after purchase of the property, based upon the declining health of her brother. He died January 1977.

  4. #4
    Famous for offering help & advice.
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Nottingham (UK)
    Posts
    1,431
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked 267 Times in 263 Posts

    Default

    Colin,

    I’m sure many Forum members have experience of probate in the UK but even if a qualified lawyer came up here with some pro bono advice, you couldn’t trust it as it doesn’t apply to your particular case. I would wait until your solicitor gets back to you with their opinion.
    malcolm99

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to malcolm99 For This Useful Post:

    Colin Rowledge (22-01-2012)

  6. #5
    Settled in very nicely!
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Oakville, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    2,648
    Thanks
    385
    Thanked 67 Times in 60 Posts

    Default

    I intend to wait, Malcolm, but I am just curious about whether others on the forum may have experienced similar situations and their responses may assist others in the future.

    Colin

  7. #6
    Settled in very nicely!
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Oakville, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    2,648
    Thanks
    385
    Thanked 67 Times in 60 Posts

    Default

    Just to update this thread. I've had some responses from my UK solicitor. It doesn't answer the question about why there was a 10 year waiting period to dispose of the property. I presume that her solicitors used some of her estate to maintain the residence between 1983 and 1993 and that the residence was not unoccupied during this period.

    One of the things that we have discovered is that by 1995 the S.R.A had become involved and all active files had been reassigned.

    So, in short, I think I'll just contimue to wait on results from the expert!!

    No further comments on this thread are likely to assist me so feel that this is now a moot point.

    Colin

  8. #7
    Bo's oldest friend, Super Moderator and Actor Searcher Ladkyis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Newport, Gwent
    Posts
    1,949
    Blog Entries
    4
    Thanks
    26
    Thanked 48 Times in 42 Posts

    Default

    Do you want this thread closed Colin?
    Ladkyis

    Cinderella is proof that a new pair of shoes can change your life!

  9. #8
    Knowledgeable and helpful
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    796
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 71 Times in 71 Posts

    Default

    I know what has been said....

    One of the things that we have discovered is that by 1995 the S.R.A had become involved and all active files had been reassigned.
    Progress you are now only <20 years adrift and I think you have summed it up by stating S.R.A are involved, translation.....

    Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) regulates solicitors

    Jx

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts