I have the Wills of both parties but cannot fathom the reason for a certain item.
First the background:
1] A widower and his unmarried sister, buy a house jointly in c. 1974 - so it is a recent event.
2] He dies. He doesn't want the property sold in the event of his death prior to his sister, so a provision in his will stipulates that she can reside in the residence. His estate goes through probate as is distributed.
3] She dies [1983]. Her will stipulates that the residence cannot be sold for 10 years after her death.
The questions is in 2 parts:
1] Why was such a provision made in her Will?
2] What impact would such a provision have on the Estate of her late brother when the property was sold [after 1993] and consequently, the residue legatee.
I'm not looking for legal advice - I have a solictor in Emgland handling this matter, but it is in early stages.
I am just curious about the matter and feel that directing it towards this forum may assist others in the future.
Thanks
Colin
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8
-
22-01-2012 8:29 PM #1Settled in very nicely!
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- Oakville, Ontario, Canada
- Posts
- 3,471
- Thanks
- 577
- Thanked 137 Times in 104 Posts
A question about items in a recent Will
-
22-01-2012 8:34 PM #2Jan1954Guest
Just after a bit of clarification, Colin....
What was the date of the sister's will? Was it made after the brother had died?3] She dies [1983]. Her will stipulates that the residence cannot be sold for 10 years after her death.
-
22-01-2012 8:46 PM #3Settled in very nicely!
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- Oakville, Ontario, Canada
- Posts
- 3,471
- Thanks
- 577
- Thanked 137 Times in 104 Posts
In a word - NO!
Their respective Wills were made shortly after the property was purchased. Hers was done October 21, 1976. This may be a re-write of an earlier Will made after purchase of the property, based upon the declining health of her brother. He died January 1977.
-
22-01-2012 9:11 PM #4Brick wall demolition expert!
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- Nottingham (UK)
- Posts
- 2,194
- Thanks
- 50
- Thanked 439 Times in 433 Posts
Colin,
I’m sure many Forum members have experience of probate in the UK but even if a qualified lawyer came up here with some pro bono advice, you couldn’t trust it as it doesn’t apply to your particular case. I would wait until your solicitor gets back to you with their opinion.malcolm99
-
The Following User Says Thank You to malcolm99 For This Useful Post:
Colin Rowledge (22-01-2012)
-
22-01-2012 9:17 PM #5Settled in very nicely!
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- Oakville, Ontario, Canada
- Posts
- 3,471
- Thanks
- 577
- Thanked 137 Times in 104 Posts
I intend to wait, Malcolm, but I am just curious about whether others on the forum may have experienced similar situations and their responses may assist others in the future.
Colin
-
29-02-2012 2:01 AM #6Settled in very nicely!
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- Oakville, Ontario, Canada
- Posts
- 3,471
- Thanks
- 577
- Thanked 137 Times in 104 Posts
Just to update this thread. I've had some responses from my UK solicitor. It doesn't answer the question about why there was a 10 year waiting period to dispose of the property. I presume that her solicitors used some of her estate to maintain the residence between 1983 and 1993 and that the residence was not unoccupied during this period.
One of the things that we have discovered is that by 1995 the S.R.A had become involved and all active files had been reassigned.
So, in short, I think I'll just contimue to wait on results from the expert!!
No further comments on this thread are likely to assist me so feel that this is now a moot point.
Colin
-
29-02-2012 9:39 AM #7Super Moderator
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Location
- Newport, Gwent
- Posts
- 1,705
- Blog Entries
- 4
- Thanks
- 39
- Thanked 140 Times in 84 Posts
Do you want this thread closed Colin?
Ladkyis
“You can’t give her that!” she screamed. “It’s not safe!”
IT’S A SWORD, said the Hogfather. THEY’RE NOT MEANT TO BE SAFE.
I am fluent in three languages, English, Sarcasm and Profanity
-
29-02-2012 10:23 AM #8Famous for offering help & advice
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- Cheshire UK
- Posts
- 1,132
- Thanks
- 5
- Thanked 170 Times in 168 Posts
I know what has been said....
Progress you are now only <20 years adrift and I think you have summed it up by stating S.R.A are involved, translation.....One of the things that we have discovered is that by 1995 the S.R.A had become involved and all active files had been reassigned.
Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) regulates solicitors
Jx
Here to help you trace your British Family History. Copyright © British-Genealogy.com
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 1:59 AM.
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.3
Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 1:59 AM.
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.3
Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.

Reply With Quote

Bookmarks