+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Loves to help with queries.
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    124
    Thanks
    15
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Default Keeping it in the family?

    I was looking for some people in the Apprentice records and it occurred to me that there were no references (that I could see) to a son being apprenticed to his father. Did the father avoid paying the tax? Would their sons (tailors in this case) be recognised by the trade, as qualified?
    Have I wasted time, money and patience looking for records were there may be none?

  2. #2
    Famous for offering help & advice.
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Romsey, Hants
    Posts
    1,151
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 25 Times in 21 Posts

    Default

    Possibly.

    See the TNA Guide on Apprenticeship records. Section 4 Apprenticeships not recorded in the Apprenticeship Books has this to say:
    By the eighteenth century apprenticeships were often undertaken without any formal indenture, especially in common trades such as weaving. In many trades it was expected that men would bring up their sons or nephews to their trade.
    Additionally, Herber, in Ancestral Trails, notes that
    Some apprenticeships were exempt from duty (and so not listed), such as ... those for which the premium was less than one shilling (usually where a boy was apprenticed to his father or another relative).
    Colin

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts