My 3 x great grandmother is reportedly named Amelia Stratford nee Cooksey and was also reportedly born in Bethnal Green circa 1843.
She married Richard Stratford in Newington in 1862 (the marriage is on Ancestry in their London marriages collection). Unfortunately, the space where her father's name would be states "----- Cooksey, deceased" so either she didn't know her father's first name or she was illegitimate.
I can't find Amelia's birth on Freebmd so am guessing that she was registered under a different name and I also can't find her on any of the censuses.
Has anyone got any ideas as to how to find out the names of her parents?
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 79
-
23-02-2011 11:49 AM #1Tries hard!
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Location
- England
- Posts
- 1,624
- Thanks
- 152
- Thanked 49 Times in 49 Posts
Amelia Cooksey born Bethnal Green in 1843?
-
23-02-2011 12:19 PM #2Famous for offering help & advice.
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- Nottingham (UK)
- Posts
- 1,431
- Thanks
- 38
- Thanked 267 Times in 263 Posts
I know it's not Stratford but on the 1851 census there’s an Amelia Cooksey in Lambeth, age 9, born Surrey: HO107 piece 1575 folio 582 page 9. This fits in nicely with the marriage details on Ancestry.
(Record in care of TNA, Crown Copyright).
-
23-02-2011 12:22 PM #3Super Moderator
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- South London
- Posts
- 3,309
- Thanks
- 67
- Thanked 1,025 Times in 1,010 Posts
As Malcolm has mentioned above, have you considered the Amelia Cooksey who is in the Norwood Workhouse in Lambeth in 1851. Although she is recorded as being born abt 1842 in Surrey, either the workhouse or Amelia herself may have been confused about her place of birth.
You could look through the Lambeth Poor Law Records held on Ancestry. It would mean browsing through the images as they haven’t yet been transcribed.
-
23-02-2011 12:24 PM #4Tries hard!
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Location
- England
- Posts
- 1,624
- Thanks
- 152
- Thanked 49 Times in 49 Posts
-
23-02-2011 12:31 PM #5Tries hard!
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Location
- England
- Posts
- 1,624
- Thanks
- 152
- Thanked 49 Times in 49 Posts
-
23-02-2011 12:37 PM #6Famous for offering help & advice.
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- Nottingham (UK)
- Posts
- 1,431
- Thanks
- 38
- Thanked 267 Times in 263 Posts
Try here: http://
search.ancestry.co.uk/search/db.aspx?dbid=1557
-
The Following User Says Thank You to malcolm99 For This Useful Post:
RobinC (23-02-2011)
-
23-02-2011 12:39 PM #7Famous for offering help & advice.
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- Nottingham (UK)
- Posts
- 1,431
- Thanks
- 38
- Thanked 267 Times in 263 Posts
-
23-02-2011 12:46 PM #8Tries hard!
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Location
- England
- Posts
- 1,624
- Thanks
- 152
- Thanked 49 Times in 49 Posts
-
23-02-2011 12:53 PM #9Tries hard!
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Location
- England
- Posts
- 1,624
- Thanks
- 152
- Thanked 49 Times in 49 Posts
Is it possible that Amelia could still have been in the workhouse in 1861 or would she have been put into service like others from the workhouse were?
-
23-02-2011 01:05 PM #10Famous for offering help & advice.
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- Nottingham (UK)
- Posts
- 1,431
- Thanks
- 38
- Thanked 267 Times in 263 Posts
Because I hadn't checked the dates of the records for the Workhouse. I must say it seems a bit old (18) to still be in the workhouse without being 'farmed out' somewhere. Evidence from the 1871 censuses onwards makes it look as though she was in good health!
I've failed to find her in 1861 of course. I'll keep looking.
A division of and sponsored by Parish Chest Ltd.
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:38 AM.
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.3
Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.

Reply With Quote

Bookmarks