+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Loves to help with queries.
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    gloucestershire
    Posts
    172
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts

    Default Minimum age for apprenticeship

    I have just received a copy of a settlement examination in which it is stated that a boy aged 6 1/2 years old (in 1783) was placed in an apprenticeship by the Overseers of the Poor. Quite apart from any child welfare considerations, I find it hard to imagine that at that age he would have been able to provide his "master", a farmer, with much productive service. More of a liability, I should think. In later apprenticeship documents I have seen, a minimum age of 9 is implied. Can anyone enlighten me regarding the statutory minimum age?

    In this case the child was "indentured". In other cases I have come across it has been specifically stated that the individual was not indentured. I would welcome an explanation of the difference.

  2. #2
    Beloved Friend RIP Thomasin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    1,967
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 108 Times in 105 Posts

    Default

    Only the other day I was amazed to see the large number of 7 year olds being apprenticed. I would be interested in the answers to your questions, too.
    Sadly, our dear friend Dorothy (alias Thomasin) passed away on Sunday, 17th. February, 2013.
    Footprints on the sands of time

  3. #3
    Jan1954
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brentor boy View Post
    In later apprenticeship documents I have seen, a minimum age of 9 is implied.
    From notes that I made years ago, the minimum age of 9 was from 1847, and that was for "Poor Law" apprentices - those sent by their Parish to learn a trade. Prior to that the minimum age appears to have been 7, but again this was for pauper children.

    I hope this helps.

  4. #4
    BeeE586
    Guest

    Default

    I had a case in Lincolnshire - pre 1800 but I can't just find the exact date. Two orphan sisters aged 7 and 9 were apprenticed 'to learn the art of housewifery' until 21 or married. I was pleased that at least they were together.

    Eileen

  5. #5
    Loves to help with queries.
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    gloucestershire
    Posts
    172
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jan1954 View Post
    From notes that I made years ago, the minimum age of 9 was from 1847, and that was for "Poor Law" apprentices - those sent by their Parish to learn a trade. Prior to that the minimum age appears to have been 7, but again this was for pauper children.

    I hope this helps.
    Thanks Jan, that is interesting and does help with the different age limits. I suppose it is just possible that my man was mistaken when he gave the age at which he was apprenticed although I would have expected the Justices to have questioned it at the time.

  6. #6
    Starting to feel at home.
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Illinois, USA
    Posts
    51
    Thanks
    13
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Default

    What kind of information can be found in the apprentice papers? Is it worth getting the papers?

  7. #7
    Geoffers
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ChattieKathy
    What kind of information can be found in the apprentice papers? Is it worth getting the papers?
    Apprenticeship indentures were for the most part private agreements between master, apprentice and the father of the apprentice - useful in giving the name of two generations where you may be struggling to find a father's name - though where an illegitimate child is put to an apprenticeship I have seen the grandfather's name recorded as the father.

    They are useful sources of information but survival rate is variable - you may well find them indexed in a County Record Office catalogue, or posibly by a search of Access to Archives.

    The Board of Stamps, Apprenticeship Books can be helpful too - see here

    The Society of Genealogists in London has a collection of records.

    TNA has a research guide on the subject - click here

  8. #8
    Loves to help with queries
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Hampshire
    Posts
    173
    Thanks
    46
    Thanked 17 Times in 16 Posts

    Default

    Children this young were employed in factories in the 19th C. It seems horrid to us, but small children could keep a workshop clean and tidy, operate bellows, do simple tasks. They might have dreadful lives, but they would be a lot better off, if they were apprenticed to a decent man, than in the workhouse.
    We probably under-estimate the capabilities of children now: a seven year old could do most of the tasks involved in running a house these days: operating vacuum cleaners, washing machines, etc. I don't mean that they should, just that they are physically capable of it. Perhaps not all the cooking. I remember doing serious cooking (Spanish Omelettes and Jam Tarts) at eight. Scrubbed hands, no messing about, and clearing up afterwards. And helping feed the twin babies: mixing the feed, sterilising bottles etc. I was proud to be of use.

  9. #9
    Starting to feel at home.
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    60
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts

    Default

    Interesting post.

    I have lots of foks in my family who were apprentices but I have never thought to look for any information on this, this post has given me more food for thought and even more avenues to look into.

    Thanks-Allanah

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Select a file: