+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Loves to help with queries.
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Tamworth Staffs
    Posts
    125
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts

    Default A Bit Of A Puzzle

    I have just found 2 baptismal records on the Record Pilot for a distant cousin, and am confused.

    The first is for Thomas Bengough, son of Thomas Bengough and Elizabeth, baptised 9 October 1829 at Aston Juxta Birmingham [I assume this means St Peter & St Paul].

    The 2nd record is dated 19 Oct 1829 and at first sight would appear to be a transcription error. The puzzle is the church is given as St Martin's Birmingham and the recorded name is Thomas Post Bengough, son of Thomas Bengough and Elizabeth.

    Any ideas? There may be a clue in that neither of Thomas's parents are to be found in any census returns, and in 1841 little Thomas was living with his maternal aunt and uncle.

  2. #2
    Reputation beyond repute.
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    11,757
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 526 Times in 488 Posts

    Default

    I would say you need to look at the parish registers. I don't think you should try and draw any conclusions from an index.
    Peter Goodey

  3. #3
    Knowledgeable and helpful
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    796
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 71 Times in 71 Posts

    Default

    Is one the Parish Register ( PR) record entry ( i.e the origianl source) the other the Bishop's Transcript (BT) which is a transcribed copy of the original information and extracted for the Parish Register and forwaded to the Bishops' office annually!

  4. #4
    Loves to help with queries.
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Hertfordshire
    Posts
    152
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 14 Times in 14 Posts

    Default

    I think this is probably 2 versions of the same event - especially as the date in one is 9 and in the other 19. Probably someone was unable to read the date or perhaps put both possibilities. You really do need to see the original image.

  5. #5
    Name well known on Brit-Gen.
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    North London
    Posts
    5,246
    Thanks
    39
    Thanked 754 Times in 687 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeuel View Post
    I think this is probably 2 versions of the same event - especially as the date in one is 9 and in the other 19.
    I think not. The film numbers indicate they are different parishes and different registers.

  6. #6
    Reputation beyond repute.
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    11,757
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 526 Times in 488 Posts

    Default

    It is quite possible that there really were two baptisms. You need to check the actual registers (a) to confirm or deny this and (b) to work out what was going on. An index is simply not enough.
    Peter Goodey

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts