+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Loves to help with queries.
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    102
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default EADES/WOOLMER/WAKEMAN and murder most foul

    Hi Folks

    In 1901 Harriet LAUGHER, nee EADES was murdered, in Bromsgrove, by her daughter who then committed suicide.
    There is a suspicion that Harriet had a distant relative who was also murdered.

    Does anyone know anything about what is going in this household in 1841 in New Buildings, Bromsgrove?
    HO 107/11954/4/35/21

    Thomas WOOLMER 60
    Elizabeth WOOLMER 70

    Thomas WAKEMAN 45
    Ann WAKEMAN 40
    Charles WAKEMAN 13

    Harriet EADES 11
    Alice EADES 7
    Emma EADES 6
    John EADES 3
    Caroline EADES 1

    In the 1851, Harriet has disappeared and Alice, Emma and John seem to have become WAKEMANs. Harriet married Samuel LAUGHER in 1859.

    FreeREG quotes Harriet's parents as Joseph and Ann EADES in 1829. The other children seem only to be baptiesed with Ann as their mother.


    Cheers

    Mike

  2. #2
    MarkJ
    Guest

    Default

    A guess - and thats all it is - would be

    Ann perhaps is the daughter of the Woolmers, then married Joseph Eades (or perhaps didn't - and he was maybe the reputed father or something? You would need to look in parish records for a marriage I think). Joseph - assuming he really was married to Ann - dies (again, a parish record job). With the other children only having Ann as the person baptising them, I suspect something there!
    I then guess that Ann marries a widower - Thomas Wakeman (widower guess because of Charles probably being the son of Thomas and a different lady).

    The Eades children later either took the Wakeman name for appearences or were adopted.

    But just a theory - it will need some parish record searching I think to unwravel!

    Mark

  3. #3
    Loves to help with queries.
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    102
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Hi Mark,

    That was my line of thought too. There is no record on the IGI for a Worcestershire marriage between Joseph and Ann. However, I have found one on FreeREG, must have done something stupid first time around. One wonders why Joseph's name wasn't on the baptisms of the other children....(no answer required!)

    Ann was Ann Williams, 21st June 1828. Pitty the 1841 doesn't give relationships.

    Thanks for making me go and double check

    Mike

    Still looking for anyone who has progressed further back.

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Select a file: