+ Reply to Thread
Results 31 to 40 of 46
-
09-10-2009 3:02 PM #31Completely bonkers and will never change.
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- (now) Sussex, England
- Posts
- 4,248
- Thanks
- 126
- Thanked 330 Times in 259 Posts
-
09-10-2009 3:07 PM #32JAP1Guest
Hi grisel, What incredible resources you keep turning up. That Bird link is most impressive - and quite fascinating.
Hi Pam, Now I feel ashamed that I was too lazy
to post at the time whatever few snippets I might have found out then about Lavinia. I offer the weak (false?) excuse that I thought that everything was all so complicated and confusing that I shouldn't add to it. But how often something which appears to be unrelated turns out to be the lynch pin. Anyway, now you've posted amazing full details so we have no excuse.
But I do still wonder whether William Brown WADDINGHAM's mc remains relevant or is now not needed ...
JAP
-
09-10-2009 4:38 PM #33Starting to feel at home.
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
- Southampton UK
- Posts
- 34
- Thanks
- 0
- Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
On the 1911 census it showed that they had been married 3 years. There were two children in the household: Majorie aged 3 and Charlotte (my nan) aged 2.
There is also a William Waddingham on the 1901 census born 1866 in Osbournby married to an Alice living in New Sleaford. But he didn't use the middle name brown or the initial B. If the one married to Charlotte did that may be worth me ordering (Especially as he later name a daughter Charlotte.)
I will let you know what it says
-
19-10-2009 5:32 PM #34Starting to feel at home.
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
- Southampton UK
- Posts
- 34
- Thanks
- 0
- Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Marriage certificate
Hi All
Well I finally have the marriage certificate for William Brown Waddingham and Charlotte Gowen.
He has his father listed as William Waddingham proffession Labourer, and mother listed as Elizabeth.
He gives his year of birth as 1867. (close enough)
So now trying to find out what happened to William Waddingham Senior for his name not to be given on the birth certificate.
I will keep you posted.
-
19-10-2009 6:53 PM #35Reputation beyond repute
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- Kent
- Posts
- 12,649
- Thanks
- 1
- Thanked 877 Times in 815 Posts
-
19-10-2009 10:33 PM #36Starting to feel at home.
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
- Southampton UK
- Posts
- 34
- Thanks
- 0
- Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Sorry, meant to say mother named on birth certificate as Elizabeth Waddingham, not marriage certificate.
(That will teach me to post while I am meant to be working)
-
26-10-2009 3:00 PM #37Starting to feel at home.
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
- Southampton UK
- Posts
- 34
- Thanks
- 0
- Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Well I have found a little more information out about William Waddingham Senior and Elizabeth.
It would appear that William Waddingham was born in 1816 and died in 1846, hence Elizabeth being in the workhouse listed as a Widower.
They had 5 or six children together (William, Ann, Hannah, George, James and there are one or two mentions of another son called John)
Then there was another son named Thomas who was born in 1950 (four years after William seniors death) and then William Brown in 1866, there is also an Ellen and a Sarah born in the workhouse between the 1951 and 1961 census' but I have a feeling that Ellen (born 1860) may have been Anns daughter.
William Seniors parents appear to have been another William Waddingham and Mary Wass.
I am a little stuck on Elizabeths surname, I can find a marriage between a William Waddingham and Elizabeth Dent but I have found someone elses family tree that overlaps mine and has her surname as Smith. I will continue to search.
-
07-07-2012 2:56 PM #38Completely bonkers and will never change.
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- (now) Sussex, England
- Posts
- 4,248
- Thanks
- 126
- Thanked 330 Times in 259 Posts
Petra,
I don't know if you're still around, but I'm currently deleting a backlog of emails received through a Lincolnshire mailing list, and saw this Waddingham reference. Nothing to do with William Waddingham
, but you might find it interesting.
The child may be the Sarah referred to in the 1861 census.LRSM = Lincoln, Rutland & Stamford Mercury 12 May 1854
Full details from the newspaper are given below; I have no further information.
Sleaford Petty Sessions 8 May 1854
John BRACKENBURY was charged by Eliz. WADDINGHAM with being the father of her illegitimate child. Both parties reside at Sleaford. Order made for 1s.per week.
Other bastardy cases reported in the LRSM and currently transcribed (it's an on-going work) can be found at http://www.genuki.org.uk/big/eng/LIN/bastardycases.html
Pam
-
20-09-2012 11:16 PM #39Newcomer to Brit-Gen
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Location
- Paraparaumu, New Zealand
- Posts
- 3
- Thanks
- 1
- Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hi Pam, I am a newbie who came across your thread by accident. I was trying to find references to the Sleaford workhouse on Google as I have just received the marriage certificate for Frederick Hunt and Mary Presswood 20 Feb 1840, my gggrandparents One of the witnesses is Samuel Waddingham (who is the only one not to have made an 'x' and the other is Elizabeth Presswood. Frederick's parents were Thomas Hunt and Elizabeth Brown (of Helpringham). One of their children was baptised Brown Hunt.
Mary Presswood appears to have had two illegitimate children at the workhouse, Mary in 1837 and William 14 Jan 1839. William's birth certificate has as informer William Duffy master of the workhouse. The Hunts emigrated from South Rauceby to New Zealand in July 1840. My particular interests are currently the conditions in 1817 (the year there was no summer) and why Frederick was born at North Scarle in 1818, whereas his older and younger siblings were born at South Rauceby. In January 1817 Thomas and Elizabeth Hunt buried their three children within a week, and the child she was carrying was born a few months later and died within another six months. I hope either you or someone reading this may be able to guide me in my research.
Bill
-
21-09-2012 2:22 AM #40Completely bonkers and will never change.
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- (now) Sussex, England
- Posts
- 4,248
- Thanks
- 126
- Thanked 330 Times in 259 Posts
Hi Bill,
Welcome to Brit-Gen.
You may regret specifically asking me for help as I tend to want to know every little detail. And you're going to be no
exception.
Sleaford workhouse I'm ignoring for the moment.Hi Pam, I am a newbie who came across your thread by accident. I was trying to find references to the Sleaford workhouse on Google as I have just received the marriage certificate for Frederick Hunt and Mary Presswood 20 Feb 1840, my gggrandparents One of the witnesses is Samuel Waddingham (who is the only one not to have made an 'x' and the other is Elizabeth Presswood.
On the marriage certificate of Frederick Hunt and Mary Presswood what occupation is given for Thomas, Frederick's father?
Thomas Hunt and Elizabeth Brown were married in Helpringham on 14 May 1813. Thomas is a bachelor and 'of South Rauceby' and Elizabeth is 'of this parish', i.e. Helpringham. http://www.Frederick's parents were Thomas Hunt and Elizabeth Brown (of Helpringham).
lincstothepast.com/Records/RecordDisplayTranscript.aspx?oid=506843&iid=379990
Where and when was he baptised? Did he survive to adulthood?One of their children was baptised Brown Hunt.
I want names and dates for the baptisms and burials of all the children you've found of Thomas and Elizabeth. (Burials of the children when they died young; not if they survived to adulthood.)My particular interests are currently the conditions in 1817 (the year there was no summer) and why Frederick was born at North Scarle in 1818, whereas his older and younger siblings were born at South Rauceby. In January 1817 Thomas and Elizabeth Hunt buried their three children within a week, and the child she was carrying was born a few months later and died within another six months. I hope either you or someone reading this may be able to guide me in my research.
Trust me. I might sound like an old bag but I only ask for details so that there can be no misunderstanding.
Pam
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:20 PM.
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.3
Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.


Reply With Quote
Bookmarks