+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Settling in.
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Nottingham
    Posts
    16
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default "Four-foot" and "six-foot" in Inquest Report

    Hello Railway Experts

    I have been reading a report of the Coroner's Inquest into the death of my great-great-grandfather, a railway platelayer, who died after being hit by a train on 16 January 1900.

    It would help my understanding of the report if anyone can explain what the terms "four foot" and "six foot" mean.

    With apologies for the long post, I will paste below parts of the report so you can see the terms in their context.

    Many thanks
    Ruth

    Henry Kendal, of Nab, Mirfield, a signal charge man, stated that on Tuesday morning he saw deceased leave the pointsman’s cabin to go down the line. He walked in the four-foot, and a few minutes later witness saw the 8.10am main line passenger train from Normanton to Sowerby Bridge strike deceased in the right side and knock him into the six-foot. He was looking down at the crossing at the time the train came up.

    John William Hall, the fireman on the train which knocked deceased down, said when they came near Ravensthorpe Junction the signal was against them, and they had to pull up to allow the 8.32 train to Normanton to pass. The signalman soon after allowed them to pass, and put them on the north line. On crossing over he heard a noise, and on looking out saw deceased laid in the six-foot.

  2. #2
    Reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    12,680
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 880 Times in 818 Posts

  3. #3
    Settling in.
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Nottingham
    Posts
    16
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Thanks for the link - that's a great resource.

    So it sounds like he was walking down one track between the rails (on the four-foot) and the train knocked him into the gap between the two tracks (the six-foot). The train wasn't travelling fast because it had been waiting at a signal, so he wasn't killed outright - the train took him to the next station, from where he was carried home on a stretcher, where he died two hours later. Must have had internal injuries, poor chap. The Coroner basically concluded that it was his fault for not looking out for the train.

  4. #4
    Famous for offering help & advice
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Monkton, Kent
    Posts
    1,101
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts

    Default

    If it had been nowadays, his family would have sued the railway company for not having warning notices all over the place and the train driver for not hooting in time!

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Select a file: