+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Newcomer to Brit-Gen
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Colorado, USA
    Posts
    2
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Question 1863 Coroner's Inquest

    Gggrandma died of a "concussion of the brain from an accidental fall down stairs". The informant box says "information received from Wm Johnson, Coroner for Cheshire. Inquest held 10th June 1863."

    In 1863 would an inquest have been held simply because no one was in attendance at the death or because there were potential suspicious circumstances?

    Insights?

    Kathleen

  2. #2
    uksearch
    Guest

  3. #3
    Tuch typist extrawdinaire
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Charlbury, Oxfordshire
    Posts
    12,798
    Thanks
    13
    Thanked 256 Times in 241 Posts

    Default

    In the link posted by UK, the first sentence...... "The role of a Coroner was to be informed of all sudden deaths and cases where the deceased had not been seen by a doctor within two weeks of death."........is not completely accurate.


    It should add something along the lines of "seen by a doctor within two weeks of death....for that illness which was the principal cause of death."

    There need not be suspicious circumstances to warrant an inquest.

    Geoffers

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts