Gggrandma died of a "concussion of the brain from an accidental fall down stairs". The informant box says "information received from Wm Johnson, Coroner for Cheshire. Inquest held 10th June 1863."
In 1863 would an inquest have been held simply because no one was in attendance at the death or because there were potential suspicious circumstances?
Insights?
Kathleen
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3
Thread: 1863 Coroner's Inquest
-
16-02-2006 01:27 AM #1Newcomer to Brit-Gen
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Colorado, USA
- Posts
- 2
- Thanks
- 0
- Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
1863 Coroner's Inquest
-
16-02-2006 12:35 PM #2uksearchGuest
Take a look at the following link.
http://www.genuki.org.uk/big/eng/LIN/publicrecs.html#Coroners
UK
-
16-02-2006 04:31 PM #3Tuch typist extrawdinaire
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- Charlbury, Oxfordshire
- Posts
- 12,798
- Thanks
- 13
- Thanked 256 Times in 241 Posts
In the link posted by UK, the first sentence...... "The role of a Coroner was to be informed of all sudden deaths and cases where the deceased had not been seen by a doctor within two weeks of death."........is not completely accurate.
It should add something along the lines of "seen by a doctor within two weeks of death....for that illness which was the principal cause of death."
There need not be suspicious circumstances to warrant an inquest.
Geoffers
Here to help you trace your British Family History. Copyright © British-Genealogy.com
A division of and sponsored by Parish Chest Ltd.
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:03 AM.
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.3
Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
A division of and sponsored by Parish Chest Ltd.
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:03 AM.
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.3
Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.

Reply With Quote
Bookmarks