<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>British Genealogy Forums - Church Registers</title>
		<link>http://www.british-genealogy.com/forums/</link>
		<description>Baptisms, Marriages and Burials recorded in old church registers</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 18:52:51 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>Coroners Warrant</title>
			<link>http://www.british-genealogy.com/forums/showthread.php/77724-Coroners-Warrant?goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 12:16:01 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi everyone 
 
I've just come across a burial which has 'by Coroners Warrant' written below it. Any idea why that would be? The man was 40 when buried so would it be a suspicious death? 
 
Though I may have a look at papers to see if anything in there. Is there coverage at all of Isleworth in 1815?...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- BEGIN TEMPLATE: postbit_external -->
<div>Hi everyone<br />
<br />
I've just come across a burial which has 'by Coroners Warrant' written below it. Any idea why that would be? The man was 40 when buried so would it be a suspicious death?<br />
<br />
Though I may have a look at papers to see if anything in there. Is there coverage at all of Isleworth in 1815?<br />
<br />
Thanks for your help yet again!:clap:</div>

 
<!-- END TEMPLATE: postbit_external -->]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.british-genealogy.com/forums/forumdisplay.php/42-Church-Registers">Church Registers</category>
			<dc:creator>BevMatth</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.british-genealogy.com/forums/showthread.php/77724-Coroners-Warrant</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Am I wrong:?</title>
			<link>http://www.british-genealogy.com/forums/showthread.php/77674-Am-I-wrong?goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 20:28:04 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Hi everyone. 
 
I am tracing my tree and have been for the last 6-7 years. I am also looking at my husbands tree and it is looking at this that I have come across my problem.  
 
From the start of my research I have always tried to get as much proof for my findings and note sources as much as...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- BEGIN TEMPLATE: postbit_external -->
<div>Hi everyone.<br />
<br />
I am tracing my tree and have been for the last 6-7 years. I am also looking at my husbands tree and it is looking at this that I have come across my problem. <br />
<br />
From the start of my research I have always tried to get as much proof for my findings and note sources as much as possible. I have come across a few trees on a well known website that match part of my own yet when I get to an ancestor called Thomas Kennett abt 1776 Wickhambreux, Kent I have completely different information than them. They have him marrying Mary Ann Fox yet I have failed to find a marriage that I think is correct and the name I have is just Mary (could be Mary Ann I know). The one possibility I can find puts him at 13 and her at about 9! They also have completely different parents from the ones I have. I can only find one baptism in 1776 +/- 2yrs on family search and that has parents as John and Anne Kennett. As there is no source information I am unable to check the information in the other trees. Should I completely disregard the other trees? Unless I can prove something (within reasonable bounds) I dont like moving backwards with something. I have come across this before a couple of times and have always been able to sort out the differences. Help!<br />
<br />
Bev</div>

 
<!-- END TEMPLATE: postbit_external -->]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.british-genealogy.com/forums/forumdisplay.php/42-Church-Registers">Church Registers</category>
			<dc:creator>BevMatth</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.british-genealogy.com/forums/showthread.php/77674-Am-I-wrong</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Private baptism</title>
			<link>http://www.british-genealogy.com/forums/showthread.php/77666-Private-baptism?goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 03:32:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[I have a record of Baptism Jan 1860 for All Souls C of E, Vauxhall, Liverpool, where the child was "Privately Baptised". Does this mean  the child was baptised by a member of her family i.e. clergy rather than the church's incumbent. Any suggestions much appreciated. 
Stephanie]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- BEGIN TEMPLATE: postbit_external -->
<div>I have a record of Baptism Jan 1860 for All Souls C of E, Vauxhall, Liverpool, where the child was &quot;Privately Baptised&quot;. Does this mean  the child was baptised by a member of her family i.e. clergy rather than the church's incumbent. Any suggestions much appreciated.<br />
Stephanie</div>

 
<!-- END TEMPLATE: postbit_external -->]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.british-genealogy.com/forums/forumdisplay.php/42-Church-Registers">Church Registers</category>
			<dc:creator>shume</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.british-genealogy.com/forums/showthread.php/77666-Private-baptism</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
