View RSS Feed

shewhoseeks

Hodgepodge of ancestry

Rating: 3 votes, 4.00 average.
I am a mutt genealogically speaking. Though I subscribe to the belief in canine's, mutt's are sometimes the best, prettiest, and healthiest of the animal, I am not so sure about the human correlation. I am a rather proud mutt, but my family history is a varied mixture of heritage that makes me envy those who can trace their trees back 400 or more years. I can tell you with all honesty, I will never be able to do that. Nonetheless, what I have found has been astounding.

My paternal grandfather was part Choctaw (proven), and part Cherokee (not proven). Once he said his grandpa was part Scot's Irish, funny he was right. Funny because Pop never spoke about his family, in fact, felt he was orphaned, when he had a passle full of cousins and a few Aunt's running around that he missed way too many years with. His father who died in prison was Cherokee per his grandmother, and given her heritage, I tend to believe it. You see his mother's mother was Choctaw, and what little I know of her, that was the last thing she would lie about. In the last few years of her life she refused to speak English, speaking only Choctaw. Oh, how I would have loved to have met her. Margaret's relations are rich and deep in the Choctaw tribe, two of her great grandmother's were the nieces of Chiefs. In the Choctaw tribe, the maternal Uncle was the authoritarian, and once, in the family these two men, among the most renown of the Choctaws, were once the men who decided the future of these ancestresses of mine. The males in this line, well, some left alot to be desired, but boy did the women accomplish alot. I admire them. Because of his ancestry, my grandfather was rather dark skinned. Folks in New York didn't know what he was, they thought he was Italian. In California, they thought he was mexican. When my blond and blue eyed grandmother married him, it raised alot of eyebrows. My grandfather died feeling her family never approved of him. And honestly, I think they didn't.

Though of a working class family, the Hinds' have been in the states since sometime in the 1600's. Before settling in Syracuse, where my grandmother was born, they were farmers, but the history I always heard made me think they kind of thought they were superior to my grandfather. His poverty in his youth was so much more pronounced than the struggle of the working class Hinds. Grandma's mom was a first generation American. Knowing she was raised by a widow, I imagine she knew tough times too, but it was different. G.G. (what us kids called her, because there were too many Grandma's around, it stood for Great grandma) was opinionated, outspoken. A real spitfire of a woman, and boy could she cook. I used to love to sit and watch her in the kitchen. From pictures I see her children, with the exception of my grandmother, resembled her. It's a pity she never knew her father. I wonder what drove him to suicide, leaving his very young children and wife alone in a foreign country. What must it have been like to have grown up like that? Needless to say, my grandmother, of all English heritage, is the only Yankee ancestry I have. I say Yankee, because well, the East coast is an entirely different animal from my southern ancestor's, and well they were different types of people.

My Dad's family were southerner's through and through. I have found one family member who was a Union soldier, but the rest were Confederate. Never mind that they didn't own slaves for the most part, they were what in the south were called Cracker's. Compared to the glorious plantation owners, they really didn't have much. They scraped by on their land. Most worked in the lumbar industry. They had large families and lived in communities of other immigrant families who had come to the area by way of South Carolina. They intermarried, and these communities have a rich history. Many of the descendants still live in the same area, most had branches move off and go to Texas, and became pioneers of that great state. They lived in rural areas, still covered by dense forests to this day. They were poor, and often could not read or had very little schooling. They were proud of their Scottish heritage. The English families of this side were quite the same, but they didn't come as late to the states, they were among the earliest colonists, and fought in the American Revolution. Many I believe ended up in Alabama and Florida because they were Tory sympathizers. It wasn't a good thing to support Britain back then, so they came to a wild country filled with Indians and the Spanish government. The same indians incidentally that were my maternal grandfather's relatives and neighbors. In the states we call them the Scots Irish, or sometimes the Ulster Irish, these Scottish immigrants, who weren't Irish at all. They are however the backbone of our early pioneers here in the states. Some of our best known men of history are from the same background.

I suppose compared to being able to say my family has been here for hundreds and hundreds of years, my families presence in the south for 225 years is small, but given that the country itself isnt' that old, I am proud of it. Proud of all of my family, of all that they accomplished, even if it isn't the stuff of history books.

Part English, Part Scottish, Part Welsh, Part Choctaw, Part Cherokee, Part Creek, yes, I am truly a mutt, but a proud one. I feel fortunate that I have found so many of my family, and all that it has taught me.

Submit "Hodgepodge of ancestry" to Digg Submit "Hodgepodge of ancestry" to del.icio.us Submit "Hodgepodge of ancestry" to StumbleUpon Submit "Hodgepodge of ancestry" to Google

Categories
Uncategorized

Comments

  1. Zenith's Avatar
    And there was me thinking I had it hard working out if my ancestors were English, Scots, Welsh or Irish. At least my background is limited to the British Isles. Your background crosses an ocean and a continent!
    I think it's impressive that you've managed to track down as much as you have. Don't worry about not tracing your tree back 400 years because most people can usually only get to the mid 1700's which is still an achievement in my opinion. The only people who can reliably go back to the 1600's are landed gentry, people of significance or royalty.

    Stay true to your nick and keep seeking. :)
  2. shewhoseeks's Avatar
    I can trace to the 1700's on almost every line here in the states other than my immigrants. (about 80 percent I gues)
    Mom's side, The Trahern's I can trace to 1725. I think I know his father, but until I get to Maryland I won't know for sure. The choctaw were born in 1760's, that's as far as I will ever go. I have the name of the females which is an accomplishment there. The whites who came and married them all came from Virginia, I know they were born about 1760 or so, and their names. George Adams, well that bugger lied so many times, I just haven't tried on him, The Rogers, we know them until at least 1790, and probably, if the information in a journal is right, much further in Virgiina. Their wives were also Rodgers, and I think Cherokee, so I end with them, about 1820. The Hinds, they wrote a book about in 1899, it traces them back to the 1640's I believe. The Hager's I can trace to 1800, and if I could find the name of the husband for sure, I could go back another 100 years. I know where they came from, but not who. We still don't know my grandfather's paternal grandma's name though, so there's another dead end, and we don't know the surname of his maternal great grandmother either.

    On my Dad's side, My Baker's, Copelands and Brunsons all were American Revolution soldiers, there are online genealogies that go back to the 1600's but all I know for sure is mid 1700s..I get lost after that, and again, I need to go to South Carolina. My McCurdy was born in 1793, the dang individual isn't found where he said he was born, but maybe there's something in South Carolina. My Pyburn was born mid 1700's, he was I think a Tory sympathizer, he came to the Spanish Territory of Alabama in 1784. My Hardy, well I stop at 1810 on him, I know he's from GA. but I can't link him just yet. We are looking into genetic testing for some descendants, and it may just spring a match with some other families. My Beck's were from SC...I can trace him to 1790, and I just haven't confirmed his father yet, again need to go to SC, the same story for my Franklins, my Vaughns and my Johnsons. The Owens and Howards are in the culpepper archives, they are supposed to be gentry, I haven't bothered beyond about 1775, too hard to prove, and I just don't trust other's genealogies a hundred percent. The Barnes I know til 1820, my aunt says she knows it further, but I don't know if I trust the research, it just doesn't pan out for me from what I discovered, I want more proof to believe it.

    Still, aside from the Creek, Choctaw and Cherokee, lol, we share a common ancestry, just a continent away. If I were to do a mitrochondrial dna it would show some women in Britain.
Select a file: