earthmother
11-02-2010, 6:52 PM
I have a recurring problem, and I wonder if it is something to do with the way data was collected at the time.
I have Romanies in my tree - and because they intermarry several times, I've gone into more detail on the siblings of my direct line than I would usually. I can trace them all quite well between 1901 and 1871, but I have yet to find one family or person on the 1861 or earlier.
So - would this have been the Romanies themselves not doing the census, or the enumerators for the way they recorded them (I have a couple of occassions on the later returns where it is a '3 families in tents on the common' type of entry, with the family groups all mixed up - did they maybe not even bother to take names in 61, and if so, how do I find them?). Was the census compulsory from 1841, or was it not truly enforced until 1871?
I have Romanies in my tree - and because they intermarry several times, I've gone into more detail on the siblings of my direct line than I would usually. I can trace them all quite well between 1901 and 1871, but I have yet to find one family or person on the 1861 or earlier.
So - would this have been the Romanies themselves not doing the census, or the enumerators for the way they recorded them (I have a couple of occassions on the later returns where it is a '3 families in tents on the common' type of entry, with the family groups all mixed up - did they maybe not even bother to take names in 61, and if so, how do I find them?). Was the census compulsory from 1841, or was it not truly enforced until 1871?