PDA

View Full Version : An Old Chestnut revisited.



David Annis
07-09-2009, 4:04 PM
At the risk of boring a few good folk on here, is there any chance of persuading the powers that be to release the 1921 census.
My reason for this is very selfish, I may not be around in 2021 and will more than likely have joined the "Daisy Apprecation Society"
In the First World War nearly every family lost relatives. Famlies were split up,
leaving widows and orphans. Whole families moved to new locations and some to different parts of the country. The war effort brought new employment so that was another reason to up sticks and move to a different location.
By 1921 the family losses would be starkly apparent and the changes to the family membership would show clearly what the war had done to change there lives forever. The release would answer so many questions and also solve so many riddles. It would also show how the British pulled themselves up by the bootstraps and carried on after such a terrible war.
As far as I know there was never any agreement when the census was taken that its contents would only be released after 100yrs. It is my understanding
that the Americans have released their census's up as far as the 1940's.
No dought someone will pick up on that one.
Anyone born in 1921 will be around 88yrs old now and I cannot see many objecting to its release in fact they may be tickled pink to see there families remembered in print.
Census's are taken at the time by Goverments to gain important facts concerning the population but after a few decades have past they no longer hold such importance but slide into being important historical facts and figures
that would do no harm if we were all allowed to see them.
Cheers
Dave.

Pam Downes
07-09-2009, 4:35 PM
Sorry, Dave, but the short answer regarding the release of the 1921 is - no.
Probably not ever, if you read the last paragrah in this post (http://www.british-genealogy.com/forums/showthread.php?p=93476&highlight=1921+census#post93476). (The earlier part of the post refers to a petition to get the 1911 and later censuses such as the 1921 released earlier than the 100-year rule.)
And a further reply (http://www.british-genealogy.com/forums/showpost.php?p=104148&postcount=2) from Peter Goodey.
And a reply (http://www.british-genealogy.com/forums/showpost.php?p=93494&postcount=10) to a dim blonde. ;)

So perhaps the short answer isn't 'no', but 'never'.
Pam

Pam Downes
07-09-2009, 4:53 PM
I knew there was a better link (http://www.british-genealogy.com/forums/showpost.php?p=94245&postcount=14) somewhere in the forum. :)
1920 Census Act (http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/%7Eframland/acts/1920%20Census%20Act.htm).
And, as instructed, scroll to the bottom for the link to the 1991 Confidentiality Act.
Pam

David Annis
08-09-2009, 1:55 PM
Oh well. Grrrrrr. I must have missed all that info. Sorry to have wasted peoples time.
I must say I cannot think why this information should be kept under lock and key, unless it holds some dire and dark secrets that are held on a "need to know only", basis.
Goverments, politicians and parliment, I'm sick of the lot of them.
Nothing more than snake oil sellers and three card trick shysters.
Cromwell where are you?
Cheers
Dave.

Pam Downes
08-09-2009, 3:08 PM
Oh well. Grrrrrr. I must have missed all that info. Sorry to have wasted peoples time.
I must say I cannot think why this information should be kept under lock and key, unless it holds some dire and dark secrets that are held on a "need to know only", basis.
Goverments, politicians and parliment, I'm sick of the lot of them.
Nothing more than snake oil sellers and three card trick shysters.
Cromwell where are you?
Cheers
Dave.
Of course you missed that info - you weren't a forum member when it was posted in 2007. :)
And you wouldn't want the government to start breaking the rules of a lifetime and start reneging on their promises would you? It's nice to know that they still believe that data shouldn't be handed out willy-nilly to private firms who have no concept of care, or left behind on trains or in taxis by government employees. :D (though in honesty they deserve |nutkick| |nutkick||nutkick|and then more)
Pam