PDA

View Full Version : The Regiment lost at sea?


Ironsun
26-10-2007, 06:07 PM
Hi everyone,

I’m new to this forum and this is my first post. I have a bit of an old family mystery I’ve been attempting to solve, but my lack of knowledge and the vast amount of information available is pushing me up against a brick wall.

I recently discovered an old letter written to my great-grandmother from her sister-in-law. The letter, dated May 1909, give a bit of family history and discuss an old estate that supposedly was in the family at one time. The letter also discusses how my third great grandfather was orphaned, just after birth when his entire family drowned in an ill-fated ship disaster.

So here is a transcript of the letter, followed by facts I know and facts I’ve tried to find. Any help or clues as to where I could look would be greatly appreciated. I’ve added square bracketed comments to make things a little easier to follow, (I hope).


May 1909

Eastam, [probably Eastham], England, Mr. Whitehead's daughter married John Williams. Williams' daughter married Surgeon Cockburn, officer of the 91st regiment. They had 9 sons, no daughters. Father [John Williams] was youngest son, the regiment was ordered to India, where father [John Williams] was born. They returned to England and were again ordered to India. Took all sons but father [John Williams] and a young brother named James. They left them with an Aunt named Johnstone.

The ship sank with the regiment and all were drowned. Father [John Williams] and uncle James were farmers and I presume knew nothing about the estate. The last father [John Williams] heard about the estate was that a Squire was living on the estate and paying rent for it. Some years ago Father [John Williams] put it into a lawyer’s hands -- he got the will. Father [John Williams] had it and knew he was the heir. The lawyer wanted 300 hundred dollars to pay the expenses to go over and settle the will for us. When father [John Williams] died [11 Dec 1909] we knew that Emmanuel was the heir after Emmanuel comes your son Ned.

After father [John Williams] died Bill, my brother took the will and private papers, the marriages and births are registered in England and does not matter. It would be easy to find out about a British Surgeon of the 91st Regiment and also the fact about the drowning

[Address] Chancery Court for British heirs London, England A Suburb of London.

First, Sir & Lady Whitehead of Eastam, England had 2 daughters - both got married. One of the daughters married John Williams [This John Williams is the surgeons father] against her parents wishes and they cut her off the family estate with a shilling as was the custom in England in those days. Mrs. John Williams had a daughter who married Dr. Cockburn, a surgeon in the 91st Regiment of the British Army. My father was youngest son and was named John Williams after his grandfather. Uncle James was an Artist.

Father [John Williams] learned shoe making because the surgeon, Dr. Cockburn, his wife and other sons were drowned either going to or coming from India. The daughter to whom he left everything died without sons therefore according to English Law the other daughter, who married John Williams (against there wishes and was cut off the family) having a daughter inherited the estate and fortune and their daughter Mrs. Williams was my fathers mother – {unreadable passage} the parent being drowned the matter was allowed to drop and nothing was ever done but it is there.

Chancery will never look for the heirs and it is worth looking up because after one hundred years it must be a big fortune [The genealogical pot-of-gold] - once Uncle James spoke to father about claiming it then he said no let him keep his fortune and so there was no person to look after it. I hope I have made it plain. The estate fell to the last living son and his heirs and that was father [John Williams] so Emmanuel his eldest son comes first if he does not claim it before he dies then Bill will and it will pass into Bill's family and right out of Emmanuel’s. Father was born and baptized John Williams after his mother’s father, his mother was a Miss Williams a Welsh lady.

Your Affectionate
Sister Kate

John Williams Cockburn died 25th March, 1879 at age 71 years, 10 months and 18 days according to the newspaper obit I discovered. This would place his birthday at May 7, 1807, (If all information is factual). This would mean that the ship sank about a year or so later, 1808-1810 maybe.

I’ve not found any information about a Surgeon named Cockburn in the 91st regiment. (Could aunt Kate have remembered the wrong regiment?) I’ve not found any information about the 91st regiment, or any regiment, suffering such a great loss in this time period (1808-1810).

I do not have first name for the Surgeon Cockburn, or where they lived in Engand. The Obit states John Williams was from Yorkshire and two of his sons were born in Kirkdale, Liverpool England.

Ed R.
Ottawa, Canada

Fordy
26-10-2007, 06:59 PM
I have checked most of the monthly Army Lists from 1805 to 1812 and there is no surgeon, or assistant surgeon, Cockburn - listed in any of them for the 91st Regiment of Foot. The two Battalions of the 91st also seem to have spent most of this period "at home".

Not much help I know, but I think you can rule out the 91st.

David.

bwarnerok
26-10-2007, 07:44 PM
I'm so confused trying to figure out who is who.

Are you saying you think the "money" is from the Whiteheads? I think that's the easiest way to trace this forward.

There is a John Williams who married Alice Whitehead 22 DEC 1755 Bromborough, Cheshire, England


Could that be right?

Ironsun
28-10-2007, 06:41 PM
I'm so confused trying to figure out who is who.

Are you saying you think the "money" is from the Whiteheads? I think that's the easiest way to trace this forward.

There is a John Williams who married Alice Whitehead 22 DEC 1755 Bromborough, Cheshire, England


Could that be right?

Hey your incredible, I never thought of "following the money!"

The date seems to be feasible, and names were often carried over from one generation to the next. Where did you find the marriage information. Was it an online source?

bwarnerok
28-10-2007, 07:22 PM
Hey your incredible, I never thought of "following the money!"

The date seems to be feasible, and names were often carried over from one generation to the next. Where did you find the marriage information. Was it an online source?

Oh Ed, I knew you'd ask me that. Erm. My guess would be I found it either at:

The IGI at familysearch.org
Ancestry (don't forget to look at their trees and stories/pubs tabs as well)
The National Archives

Other places I use regularly are the Digital Times and just plain old googling and then specifically at Google Books.

In situations like this I always have to go out on a limb. You might have to come down 2-3 generations off to the side in order to get back to your trunk, but if the Whiteheads had money, I'd sure look at the national Archives at the A2A blurbs and make a note of all names mentioned. Chances are, they will resurface.

Best of luck
Betsy

Ironsun
31-10-2007, 04:53 PM
This tree might make the letter easier to follow.

http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a151/vizard2005/whitehead-tree.gif

bwarnerok
31-10-2007, 08:11 PM
The picture certainly helps. From this my guess is Sir Whitehead was probably born about 1700 (1680-1710).
If Eastham is the one in Worcestershire, there are only 3 wills I "see":
William Whitehead - Sedgeworrow 1787
John Whitehead - Bedwardine 1790
Seymer Whitehead - Claines 1793
If it isn't Worcestershire, erm... spin the bottle. :-)
-b-

Wirral
01-11-2007, 02:07 PM
The place is more likely to be Eastham, Cheshire. It is on the Wirral Peninsular on the other side of the River Mersey from Liverpool, Lancashire. There was a ferry that ran from Eastham to Liverpool. People from the Wirral quite often turn up being married or baptised at Liverpool, even if they still lived in Cheshire. It was probably a nice day out & only a couple of pennies to cross!

According to the IGI:
James COCKBURN married Mary WILLIAMS 21 July 1785 at Eastham, Cheshire.
John COCKBURN born 17 October 1785, baptised 6 November 1785 at St Nicholas, Liverpool , father James COCKBURN , mother Mary.
Also John Emanuel COCKBURN born 4 Apr 1785, bap. 11 May 1788.
St Nicholas' was called "The Sailors' Church & is situated right by the docks & the Liverpool ferry. If this is the same family, then the mother would have been 6 months pregnant when she was married, which might explain why the baptisms were in Liverpool, not Eastham!

John COCKBURN married Ann CLAYTON 13 June 1830 at St Nicholas, Liverpool. Children baptised at St Peter's, Liverpool:
James Emanuel bap. 27 Dec 1831
William Joseph bap. 26 Dec 1832
Mary Ellen bap. 3 Aug 1832
James Thomas bap. 31 Aug 1835

Wirral
01-11-2007, 03:07 PM
In Gore's 1843 Liverpool Directory:
COCKBURN, John, veterinary surgeon & livery stables, 90 Lime St.

bwarnerok
01-11-2007, 04:01 PM
okay well.. spin me around. <grin>
just goes to show how much we need to think "out of the box".
I never thought of a surgeon as being a "veterinary surgeon". duhhhhhh

I'd imagine there's a generation between those 1785 and 1835 cockburns.

and what about the whiteheads?

Wirral, you are a star!!!!

-b-

Wirral
01-11-2007, 08:49 PM
Just to confuse matters still further, I have just been to my local library which has hard copies of nearly all the Liverpool directories from 1766 to 1898. 1843 is the only one that has a COCKBURN who is a surgeon/medical man/vet or anything remotely like it. But I did find these that may be of interest:
1839 COCKBURN John, boot & shoemaker, 10 Castle St, Kirkdale.
1832 COCKBURN John, boot & shoemaker, 24 Woodstock St.
1832 COCKBURN William, captain in the army, 13 Brownlow St.
1823 COCKBURN Charles, master mariner, 15 Dover St.

It is possible that the family story you have has become muddled during the years. The events may have happened, but not in that order, or not to those family members.
Where did John Williams COCKBURN end up? You gave his date of death, but what happened to him before that? I can't find him in Liverpool after 1839.

Also, the initial reason for my visit to the library was because I remembered that it has a book of transcriptions from Eastham Church. It covers the registers from 1598 to 1700 and there are lots of WHITEHEADs there. Not many WILLIAMS' & no COCKBURNs. I couldn't find a Sir & Lady WHITEHEAD.

Ironsun
02-11-2007, 02:32 AM
1839 COCKBURN John, boot & shoemaker, 10 Castle St, Kirkdale.
1832 COCKBURN John, boot & shoemaker, 24 Woodstock St.
1832 COCKBURN William, captain in the army, 13 Brownlow St.
1823 COCKBURN Charles, master mariner, 15 Dover St.

It is possible that the family story you have has become muddled during the years. The events may have happened, but not in that order, or not to those family members.

Where did John Williams COCKBURN end up? You gave his date of death, but what happened to him before that? I can't find him in Liverpool after 1839.

Also, the initial reason for my visit to the library was because I remembered that it has a book of transcriptions from Eastham Church. It covers the registers from 1598 to 1700 and there are lots of WHITEHEADs there. Not many WILLIAMS' & no COCKBURNs. I couldn't find a Sir & Lady WHITEHEAD.


Wirral,

All I can say is WOW!!!

Now where to start...

John Williams Cockburn was a Shoemaker, His son, Emanual James' Obit indicated that the family left England for Canada when Emanuel was eight years old that would make their year of departure 1850. John Williams is listed as a Shoemaker in the City of Montreal's city Directory for the year 1851. So I would say the two John Cockburn's in the 1832 & 1839 directories is the same man.

The "Gore's 1843 Liverpool Directory" reference has me a bit stumped. I can't see this veterinary surgeon as being in my Cockburn line.

Your IGI research is amazing. It goes to show that one should always study the area they are researching. I would never have thought of checking out Cheshire. You did make a small typo, The IGI lists John Emanuel COCKBURN as born 4 Apr 1788 not 1785. Interesting item, my Emanuel James always recorded his birthdate as October 15, 1843 and the IGI has a James Emanuel christened Dec 27, 1831? Are they the same person? If he did leave for Canada when he was 8 yrs old then the year would be closer to 1839, the year you lost him in Liverpool. I realize people didn't place that much importance on birth dates back then but it sure would make our lives earier if they had.

As for whether "It is possible that the family story you have has become muddled during the years. The events may have happened, but not in that order, or not to those family members." Anything is possible I guess, and other that the letter that I transcribed, that is the only evidence that I have that "John Williams was orphan with a brother when a troop transport sunk", and that letter was 100 years after the so-called events.

So I'll just follow the evidence to where it takes me (we should call this CSI:Liverpool).

Thanks for all the help. Let me digest this for a few days and get back to you.

Cheers

Ed R.

Wirral
02-11-2007, 08:40 PM
I went to Liverpool library & looked up the following records:

St Nicholas, 13 June 1830, marriage after Banns between John COCKBURN, cordwainer [shoemaker] & Ann CLAYTON, spinster, both of this parish. Witnesses were Thos. Bagnall & Thos. Quick. [Thomas Quick & Mary Quick were the witnesses on the next marriage that day. All signed their own names.]

Baptisms at St Nicholas
Born 4 April 1788, baptised 11 May 1788, John Emanuel, son of James & Mary COCKBURN, gardener, Croston Court.
Born 17 Oct 1785, baptised 6 Nov 1785, John, son of James & Mary COCKBURN, labourer, Tythebarne St.

Baptisms at St Peter's, Church St (the parish church of Liverpool)
27 Dec 1831 James Emmanuel, to John & Ann COCKBURN, Woodstock St, cordwainer
26 Dec 1832 William Joseph, to John & Ann COCKBURN, Upper Milk St, cordwainer
3 Aug 1834 Mary Ellen, to John & Ann COCKBURN, Marlborough St, cordwainer
31 Aug 1835 James Thomas, to John & Ann COCKBURN, Marlborough St, shoe maker

Send me your email address in a PM if you would like a photo of the marriage entry & of the first 2 baptisms (don't put it in the thread).

Ironsun
03-11-2007, 02:54 PM
Wirral

John & Ann's Children
All the data seems right, but I am very confused about the different birth dates for James Emanuel, other than the reversal of names (which was very common) why would someone change the year of their birth, and if the year change was done for some goal, (i.e. getting in the army, etc.), why change the day and month as well.

All documents I've accumulated state his birthdate as October 15, 1843 and there is also the issue of Richard Cockburn. That name hasn't appears yet, unless James Thomas has a middle name we haven't seen . Though I never had a birth date for Richard his year of birth was close to 1843 also.

John & Mary's Children
How do we tie either of the John Cockburn's born to John & Mary to the John Cockburn that married Ann Clayton.
Any ideas?

BTW I want you to know that I appreciate all the time and effort you are putting into this effort. You are allowing me to advance my research faster that anything I could have acheive on my own.

Much Thanks
Ed R.

Here is a photo of Emanuel James Cockburn's tombstone:

http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a151/vizard2005/Emanuels_Family.jpg

Wirral
03-11-2007, 04:02 PM
It might be worthwhile going back & double-checking all that you have got so far on the family, just to make sure that there aren't any false assumptions made along the way. For instance, I looked up the marriage of John COCKBURN & Ann CLAYTON because they were listed on the tree that you put on this thread. Do you have evidence that links them to your Emanuel J. COCKBURN? Emanuel & COCKBURN are both unusual names, so they are probably related in some way, but it may not be direct - eg they could be nephew & uncle, rather than son & father.